Message Boards Message Boards

FEM Solver for Navier-Stokes equations in 2D

GROUPS:

I'll show how to use the low level FEM functionality to code up a non-linear Navier-Stokes solver. The documentation explains the details about the low level FEM programming functionality which I use here.

Here is the basic idea: After every non-linear iteration we re-create an interpolation function from the now current solution vector and re-insert those into the PDE coefficients and iterate until converged. This will not be insanely efficient but it works on a PDE level. Now, to tackle non-linear problems it's a good idea to get the linear version to work first. In this case this is a Stokes solver.

Here is a utility function to convert a PDE into it's discretized version:

Needs["NDSolve`FEM`"]
PDEtoMatrix[{pde_, Γ___}, u_, r__] := 
 Module[{ndstate, feData, sd, bcData, methodData, pdeData},
  {ndstate} =
   NDSolve`ProcessEquations[Flatten[{pde, Γ}], u, 
    Sequence @@ {r}];
  sd = ndstate["SolutionData"][[1]];
  feData = ndstate["FiniteElementData"];
  pdeData = feData["PDECoefficientData"];
  bcData = feData["BoundaryConditionData"];
  methodData = feData["FEMMethodData"];
  {DiscretizePDE[pdeData, methodData, sd], 
   DiscretizeBoundaryConditions[bcData, methodData, sd], sd, 
   methodData}
  ]

Next is the problem setup:

μ = 10^-3;
ρ = 1;
l = 2.2;
h = 0.41;
Ω = 
  RegionDifference[Rectangle[{0, 0}, {l, h}], 
   ImplicitRegion[(x - 1/5)^2 + (y - 1/5)^2 < (1/20)^2, {x, y}]];
RegionPlot[Ω, AspectRatio -> Automatic]

enter image description here

Γ = {
   DirichletCondition[p[x, y] == 0., x == l],
   DirichletCondition[{u[x, y] == 4*0.3*y*(h - y)/h^2, v[x, y] == 0}, 
    x == 0],
   DirichletCondition[{u[x, y] == 0., v[x, y] == 0.}, 
    y == 0 || y == h || (x - 1/5)^2 + (y - 1/5)^2 <= (1/20)^2]};
stokes = {
   D[u[x, y], x] + D[v[x, y], y],
   Div[{{-μ, 0}, {0, -μ}}.Grad[u[x, y], {x, y}], {x, y}] + 
    D[p[x, y], x],
   Div[{{-μ, 0}, {0, -μ}}.Grad[v[x, y], {x, y}], {x, y}] + 
    D[p[x, y], y]
   };

First we generate the system matrices for the Stokes equation:

{dPDE, dBC, sd, md} = 
  PDEtoMatrix[{stokes == {0, 0, 0}, Γ}, {p, u, 
    v}, {x, y} ∈ Ω, 
   Method -> {"FiniteElement", 
     "InterpolationOrder" -> {p -> 1, u -> 2, v -> 2}, 
     "MeshOptions" -> {"ImproveBoundaryPosition" -> False}}];

linearLoad = dPDE["LoadVector"];
linearStiffness = dPDE["StiffnessMatrix"];
vd = md["VariableData"];
offsets = md["IncidentOffsets"];

You could solve this stationary case, but we move on: The tricky part for non-linear equations is the linearization. For that I am referring you to Chapter 5.

uOld = ConstantArray[{0.}, md["DegreesOfFreedom"]];
mesh2 = md["ElementMesh"];
mesh1 = MeshOrderAlteration[mesh2, 1];

ClearAll[rhs]
rhs[t_?NumericQ, ut_] := Module[{uOld},
  uOld = ut;
  Do[
   ClearAll[u0, v0, p0];
   (* create pressure and velocity interpolations *)
   p0 = ElementMeshInterpolation[{mesh1}, 
     uOld[[offsets[[1]] + 1 ;; offsets[[2]]]]];
   u0 = ElementMeshInterpolation[{mesh2}, 
     uOld[[offsets[[2]] + 1 ;; offsets[[3]]]]];
   v0 = ElementMeshInterpolation[{mesh2}, 
     uOld[[offsets[[3]] + 1 ;; offsets[[4]]]]];

   (* these are the linearized coefficients *)
   nlPdeCoeff = InitializePDECoefficients[vd, sd,
     "LoadCoefficients" -> {(* 
       F *)
       {-(D[u0[x, y], x] + D[v0[x, y], y])},
       {-ρ (u0[x, y]*D[u0[x, y], x] + v0[x, y]*D[u0[x, y], y]) - 
         D[p0[x, y], x]},
       {-ρ (u0[x, y]*D[v0[x, y], x] + v0[x, y]*D[v0[x, y], y]) - 
         D[p0[x, y], y]}
       },
     "LoadDerivativeCoefficients" -> -{(* gamma *)
        {{0, 0}},
        {{μ D[u0[x, y], x], μ D[u0[x, y], y]}},
        {{μ D[v0[x, y], x], μ D[v0[x, y], y]}}
        },
     "ConvectionCoefficients" -> {(*beta*)
       {{{0, 0}}, {{0, 
          0}}, {{0, 0}}},
       {{{0, 0}}, {{ρ u0[x, y], ρ v0[x, y]}}, {{0, 0}}},
       {{{0, 0}}, {{0, 0}}, {{ρ u0[x, y], ρ v0[x, y]}}}
       },
     "ReactionCoefficients" -> {(* a *)
       {0, 0, 0},
       {0, ρ D[u0[x, y], x], ρ D[u0[x, y], y]},
       {0, ρ D[v0[x, y], x], ρ D[v0[x, y], y]}
       }
     ];

   nlsys = DiscretizePDE[nlPdeCoeff, md, sd];
   nlLoad = nlsys["LoadVector"];
   nlStiffness = nlsys["StiffnessMatrix"];

   ns = nlStiffness + linearStiffness;
   nl = nlLoad + linearLoad;

   DeployBoundaryConditions[{nl, ns}, dBC];
   diriPos = dBC["DirichletRows"];
   nl[[ diriPos ]] = nl[[ diriPos ]] - uOld[[diriPos]];

   dU = LinearSolve[ns, nl];
   Print[ i, " Residual: ", Norm[nl, Infinity], "  Correction: ", 
    Norm[ dU, Infinity ]];
   uOld = uOld + dU;

   (*If[Norm[ dU, Infinity ]<10^-6,Break[]];*)

   , {i, 8}
   ];
  uOld
  ]

You'd then run this:

uNew = rhs[0, uOld];

1 Residual: 0.3  Correction: 0.387424
2 Residual: 0.000752321  Correction: 0.184443
3 Residual: 0.00023243  Correction: 0.0368286
4 Residual: 0.0000100488  Correction: 0.00264305
5 Residual: 3.6416*10^-8  Correction: 0.0000115344
6 Residual: 8.88314*10^-13  Correction: 1.22413*10^-10
7 Residual: 1.50704*10^-17  Correction: 1.08287*10^-15
8 Residual: 1.24246*10^-17  Correction: 6.93036*10^-16

See that the residual and correction converge. And do some post processing:

p0 = ElementMeshInterpolation[{mesh1}, 
   uNew[[offsets[[1]] + 1 ;; offsets[[2]]]]];
u0 = ElementMeshInterpolation[{mesh2}, 
   uNew[[offsets[[2]] + 1 ;; offsets[[3]]]]];
v0 = ElementMeshInterpolation[{mesh2}, 
   uNew[[offsets[[3]] + 1 ;; offsets[[4]]]]];
ContourPlot[u0[x, y], {x, y} ∈ mesh2, 
 AspectRatio -> Automatic, PlotRange -> All, 
 ColorFunction -> ColorData["TemperatureMap"], Contours -> 10, 
 ImageSize -> Large]
ContourPlot[v0[x, y], {x, y} ∈ mesh2, 
 AspectRatio -> Automatic, PlotRange -> All, 
 ColorFunction -> ColorData["TemperatureMap"], Contours -> 10, 
 ImageSize -> Large]
ContourPlot[p0[x, y], {x, y} ∈ mesh1, 
 AspectRatio -> Automatic, PlotRange -> All, 
 ColorFunction -> ColorData["TemperatureMap"], Contours -> 10, 
 ImageSize -> Large]

enter image description here enter image description here enter image description here

Which show the x-, y-velocity components and the pressure.


This is a re-post of the original made with authors permission.

POSTED BY: Moderation Team
Answer
1 year ago

Please take a look also at the analogical post: Solving 2D Incompressible Flows using Finite Elements

POSTED BY: Vitaliy Kaurov
Answer
1 year ago

Could you, please, suggest how to solve non-stationary problem in the similar manner?

POSTED BY: Rodion Stepanov
Answer
10 months ago

Group Abstract Group Abstract