https://community.wolfram.com RSS Feed for Wolfram Community showing any discussions tagged with Mathematica with no replies sorted by active. https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3755834 Wordle is a single-player word game acquired by the NY Times from inventor Josh Wardle about 4 years ago (https://www.nytimes.com/games/wordle). It is an English language elimination puzzle where the player attempts to determine a daily 5-letter answer word among a pool of 3,201 in 6 guesses from a pool of 14,855 5-letter guess words. There are several efficient strategies for solving the daily puzzle. The NYT game is popular, with over 4 million daily players in 2025. The wordle 5-clique problem is an intellectual curiosity and not considered an efficient solution method. It asks: what 5 word subsets of the 14,855 guess words contain 25 unique letters of the alphabet. The methodology used to solve the query follows. Computing was performed with Mathematica v.15 personal edition installed on an Intel i9-10900KF Windows 11 system overclocked to 5.1 GHz with 128 GB RAM. The current list of 14,855 guess words was obtained from https://gist.github.com/dracos/dd0668f281e685bad51479e5acaadb93 and converted to uppercase. The list was reduced in size to 9,365 words with 5 unique letters. sufficientWords = (If[Length[Union[Characters[#]]] == 5, #, Nothing] & /@ guessWords); Next, word pairs with no common letters were joined by undirected edges and placed in a dynamic array. Subsequently, the dynamic array was normalized to an ordinary list of 6,404,322 edges. edgesDA = CreateDataStructure["DynamicArray"]; Do[ iword = sufficientWords[[i]]; Do[ jword = sufficientWords[[j]]; If[! ContainsAny[Characters[iword], Characters[jword]], edgesDA["Append", iword \[UndirectedEdge] jword]], {j, i + 1, sufficientWordsCount} ], {i, 1, sufficientWordsCount - 1} ]; edges = Normal[edgesDA]; edgesDA = Null; (* 10 minutes *) The edges list was then placed in a graph: graph = Graph[edges]; (* 2 minutes *) from which the cliques were computed: all5cliques = FindClique[graph, {5}, All]; (* 1496 minutes *) Here are the 25 solutions: { {"VOZHD", "CIMEX", "GRYPT", "BLUNK", "WAQFS"} {"GLITZ", "PHYNX", "MOVED", "BRUCK", "WAQFS"} {"GLITZ", "PHYNX", "JOKED", "CRUMB", "WAQFS"} {"GLITZ", "PHYNX", "JUKED", "CROMB", "WAQFS"} {"GLITZ", "PHYNX", "DRECK", "JUMBO", "WAQFS"} {"GIZMO", "PHYNX", "VELDT", "BRUCK", "WAQFS"} {"VOZHD", "CLUNK", "GRYPT", "BEMIX", "WAQFS"} {"VOZHD", "XYLIC", "KEMPT", "BRUNG", "WAQFS"} {"FRITZ", "WHUMP", "GYVED", "BLONX", "JACKS"} {"MILTZ", "PHYNX", "GOVED", "BRUCK", "WAQFS"} {"MILTZ", "PHYNX", "JUDGE", "BROCK", "WAQFS"} {"KLUTZ", "PHYNX", "JIVED", "CROMB", "WAQFS"} {"KLUTZ", "PHYNX", "GIVED", "CROMB", "WAQFS"} {"JUMPY", "VOZHD", "TRECK", "BLING", "WAQFS"} {"JUMPY", "VOZHD", "GLENT", "BRICK", "WAQFS"} {"FRITZ", "JUMPS", "GYVED", "BLONX", "WHACK"} {"FRITZ", "JUMPS", "GYVED", "BLONX", "CHAWK"} {"JIMPY", "VOZHD", "GLENT", "BRUCK", "WAQFS"} {"FJORD", "NYMPH", "GUCKS", "VIBEX", "WALTZ"} {"FJORD", "GLITZ", "PHYNX", "WEMBS", "QUACK"} {"FJORD", "CHUNK", "GYMPS", "VIBEX", "WALTZ"} {"CYLIX", "VOZHD", "KEMPT", "BRUNG", "WAQFS"} {"VOZHD", "PLING", "TRECK", "JUMBY", "WAQFS"} {"PRICK", "VOZHD", "GLENT", "JUMBY", "WAQFS"} {"CLIPT", "VOZHD", "KRENG", "JUMBY", "WAQFS"} } Of these, the permutation {"WALTZ", "FJORD", "VIBEX", "CHUNK", "GYMPS"} is considered to contain the least uncommon words, ordered mostly from highest to lowest vowel frequencies in the answer word pool. ![letter frequencies figure][1] [1]: https://community.wolfram.com//c/portal/getImageAttachment?filename=wordleWordsInitialLetterFrequenciesFigure.jpg&userId=1957361 Richard Frost 2026-07-10T21:40:42Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3755722 &[Wolfram Notebook][1] [1]: https://www.wolframcloud.com/obj/5eb0298e-431b-4d44-b653-9b760369e22e Maher Kuzbari 2026-07-10T16:29:08Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3755323 &[Wolfram Notebook][1] [1]: https://www.wolframcloud.com/obj/55fe0c78-b69e-4300-befe-d93cf96dc6eb Naman Taggar 2026-07-10T14:25:01Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3747804 &[Wolfram Notebook][1] [1]: https://www.wolframcloud.com/obj/fce04a49-db2e-4247-97b3-fd987e17de28 AnneMarie Torresen 2026-07-07T16:32:14Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3740297 I am currently setting up a test environment to evaluate the new Wolfram Engine v15.0.0. Our development environment heavily relies on linux/arm64 architecture templates. However, when trying to pull the v15.0.0 image, our orchestration setup keeps failing. I checked the manifest payload via the Docker Registry HTTP API V2 and noticed that while v14.3.0 has the standard multi-arch support, the 15.0.0 tag seems to be missing the linux/arm64 slice entirely. Has anyone here managed to deploy v15.0.0 natively on an ARM64 environment yet? Or is this an intentional release staging choice, and the ARM64 image will be synced in a later patch? Thanks for the help! Rose Hammer 2026-06-28T14:29:18Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3735339 Kudos to WRI on release of Wolfram (Mathematica) Version 15. I jumped onto the new built-in AI Assistant [following along][1] Stephen's blog. In my trials, each trial a clean session (exit notebook and kernels), the example chat prompt "solve for the eigenmodes of a pentagonal drum" yielded varying results, not too surprising, but the second session produced failing code (syntax). Wanting to learn more, I browsed the Documentation Center ("Help"), searching on "AI Assistant" but the top hit, *tutorial/AIAssistant*, yielded a confusing page mixing the pre-V15 Notebook Assistant and V15 AI Assistant. There is better overview information available: [AI Assistant][3] and [AI Access][4]. Regarding the latter link, I wonder what is gained over the free (V15 included) "Basic" AI Access level by the paid "Pro" and "Research" levels. I'd very much appreciate an example chat session comparison between the three showing how the higher-level LLMs improve results over the Basic level. [1]: https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2026/06/launching-version-15-of-wolfram-language-mathematica-built-in-useful-ai-lots-of-new-core-functionality/#an-ai-assistant-in-every-notebook "following" [2]: tutorial/AIAssistant [3]: https://www.wolfram.com/ai-assistant/ [4]: https://www.wolfram.com/ai-access/ Frank Iannarilli 2026-06-17T23:52:10Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3726656 &[Wolfram Notebook][1] [1]: https://www.wolframcloud.com/obj/4b2aea05-d260-4b29-804b-43bac36d7569 Daniel Carvalho 2026-06-03T15:23:31Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3714447 Hello everyone, Is it possible to create a shortcut (preferably with only one key) to insert a function that I created? For example: units [ex]. Regards, Sinval Sinval Santos 2026-05-11T16:30:31Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3660974 Hello everyone, I am trying to use Wolfram g to use the Assistant. When I enter a query for example " Top 10 countries with the most engineers" The I get the subject error. Reporting the issue fails as well, saying something went wrong. ![enter image description here][1] [1]: https://community.wolfram.com//c/portal/getImageAttachment?filename=Capture1.PNG&userId=2698757 What is causing this error? How do I get this tool to work correctly? Be well, Ian Ian Anwar 2026-03-14T16:28:16Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3645383 How do you tackle complex systems without getting lost in the code? Join us for a live Q&A with Ankit Naik, author of Thinking in Systems, Not Code, a book born from years of practical experience with Modelica, system-level modeling, and systems thinking. Ankit will dive into the ideas behind the book, including how to understand complex, multi-domain systems through structure, feedback, and interactions – not just code. Bring your questions! Don't miss out! Whether you're interested in system modeling, Modelica or Wolfram System Modeler, or ways to apply systems thinking in real-world projects, this is your opportunity to engage directly with the author. Watch the livestream tomorrow, February 26th at 9 AM CST on the [Wolfram R&D YouTube channel][1]! ![enter image description here][2] > Order the book here: https://a.co/d/07FFxRUd [1]: https://youtube.com/live/vnDNQ4YzyeE [2]: https://community.wolfram.com//c/portal/getImageAttachment?filename=MasteringComplexsystems.jpg&userId=20103 Keren Garcia 2026-02-25T15:19:30Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3635801 I have a few code samples which freeze or crash my kernel on evaluation, can anybody confirm that this isn't a local issue for me? Discrete: AudioGenerator[{"Color", AudioGenerator[TimeSeries[{1}, {1}]]}] Continuous: AudioGenerator[{"Color", AudioGenerator[{"Sawtooth", .4, 5}]}] Joseph Stocke 2026-02-06T21:20:51Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3576071 &[Wolfram Notebook][1] [1]: https://www.wolframcloud.com/obj/812246e9-fbb9-4bb2-843b-8a32ee650c55 Keisy Benavides Cruz 2025-11-17T00:23:29Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3569199 &[Wolfram Notebook][1] [1]: https://www.wolframcloud.com/obj/581e0b2c-c1c4-428b-b2d8-67501096ac1c Denis Ivanov 2025-11-02T07:36:59Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3563534 In this preliminary post I introduce the idea of dynamical Transformation Functions, that is, the situation where the Transformation Matrices have functions rather than numbers as entries. I apply this specifically in the case of even (direct) isometries of real 3-space. I introduce DITF format which is independent of the construction of the transformation function. I give a geometrical interpretation which shows motion in space not only the position but also the orientation of the object. Several examples are given. Barry H Dayton 2025-10-22T00:17:13Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3562641 **The problem** I run Mathematica 12 from home via a Win11 VM on Proxmox. This configuration has run fine for years. Recently during an upgrade to Win11 25H2 I went to test to make sure everything was functional with a quick BenchmarkReport[] but it caused the kernel to die at Test 3, FFT. Its a very repeatable failure. Just before upgrading to 25H2 I had changed my processor type for this VM to x86-64-v3 +aes from -v2 + aes. I had issues on another vm where Win11 didnt want to upgrade with v2. I didnt originally run the processor as "host" as I am running dual E5-2699v4 Xeons, Win11 doesnt support by age despite having all the instructions needed. I have used this VM with Win10 and Win11 for years running Mathematica without issue. In the past I would use BenchmarkReport[] as a quick check of functionality after any upgrades or changes. This is the first time its failed. A quick test using ParallelTable[sin[x],{x,0,pi,10^-6}] works fine A quick test of Fourier[{1, 1, 2, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0}] works fine But a simple, Needs["Benchmark`"] BenchmarkReport[] Fails while calculating Step 3, FFT. The kernel simply die with no error message or warning. If I watch carefully with Task Manager it looks like the kernel dies, Mathematica recreates the kernel, then it dies again immediately. I also tried running this command through mathscript with -verbose but it gives me no additional details why its dying. I went back and tested some older notebooks I had. One of the first ones I tried died during a NonLinearModelFit of a PieceWise function with Sin[]s. Piecewise[{ { y0 + ( A1 Sin[ 2 \[Pi] ( x - x1)/t1] Sin[ 2 \[Pi] ( x - x2)/t2] ) + A3 Sin[2 \[Pi] (x - x3)/t3], x >= xon }, {y0, x < xon} }] This had worked in the past but now it dies just like BenchmarkReport, the kernel dies with no errors. **Fixes tried** So, I set the cpu back to v2 + aes for the vm config in proxmox but the kernel still dies. Set the cpu to Host in case its an issue with AES being passed correctly but it still dies I had Ballooning memory on so I turned it off, no change I had NUMA on so I turned it off, no change I uninstalled, reinstalled Mathematica 12.0 but it still fails I installed a demo copy of Mathematica 14.3, BenchmarkReport[] and my notebook run without issue. **System Info** Running a network version of Mathematica 12.0 with MathLM on another VM for the license. License is for 2 instances and 16 kernels. The VM is running under proxmox 8.4.14. The vm was just recently upgraded to Win11 25H2 but I am not sure when I last ran BenchmarkReport[]. I have run BenchmarkReport[] on this vm multiple times with some older flavors of win11 but I cant remember when I last ran it. I had recently installed the virtio drivers for this vm on the previous Win11 version but I hadnt run Mathematica since then. Could be a contributing factor. Proxmox has gone through a recent upgrade with a reboot of the host. I hadnt tried test Mathematica afterwards. Could be a contributing factor. The vm has been tested with cpu set to Host, x86-64-v2+aes, x86-64-v3+aes, numa on and off, ballooning on and off, with 32GB memory configured for the vm. This vm is set to get 2 processors of 8 cores each, The vm is only running microsoft virtual graphic drivers and is only accessed via remote desktop, not SPICE. As far as I can tell Win11 is working as expected. I am considering a fresh install of Win11 if no better ideas surface. The host system is dual E5-2699 v4 with 512GB. The host system runs a mix of vms and containers. **Summary** I know this is probably a very weird edge case of using a VM with such an old version of Mathematica. The kernel dying does seem to fail for more than just Benchmark so its most likely not a single package responsible. The failure is limited to Mathematica 12 as far as I can tell. Just wanted to figure this our before I start embarking on a bunch of calculations. Any thoughts are appreciated. Mike Morrell 2025-10-19T19:10:08Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3561390 &[Wolfram Notebook][1] [1]: https://www.wolframcloud.com/obj/9602e720-c5ee-4e57-bbde-c1b11e0b75d4 Daniel Carvalho 2025-10-16T23:00:15Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3558755 New feature suggestion: It would be really great if Mathematica offered a way to automatically save an enhanced version of .nb that contains, in effect, the equivalent of a .mx file with the results of all of the cells that have already been evaluated. This combination .nb/.mx file (perhaps to be called .nbx?) would avoid the time/effort required to either: (1) save a .mx file at the end of each Mathematica session and re-load it at the start of the next session, or (2) redo the evaluation of the saved .nb file at the start of each new session. Thanks, RM Richard Makadok 2025-10-09T18:37:41Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3558367 Hello I tried using the shell script from wolfram website to install 14.2 on Trixie Didn’t work due to failed dependencies… So I downloaded these two pkgs manually from ftp.debian.org libprec3_8.39-13_arm64.deb; libwayland-egl1-mesa-22.3.6-1+deb12u1_arm64.deb And after installing them, I can proceed with the installation… Any suggestions if there is a better way? Ed Wong 2025-10-09T02:29:04Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3533938 My clipboard has bifurcated into two clipboards. The normal system clipboard and a mathematica artifact that can't be changed or deleted. The normal one follows the normal rules within mathematica, including all keyboard shortcuts and built-in functions. It can be used to copy and paste to and from mathematica and any other program. However, pasting in mathematica pastes not only the normal clipboard line but also a second line from a previous clipboard that has become stuck somewhere in some other part of mathematica I can't find or access. So you get e.g. Paste[] ~ artefact ~ a CopyToClipboard[b] Paste[] ~ artefact ~ b Travis Scott 2025-08-21T12:54:54Z https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/3531253 I'm running *Mathematica* 14.0 on Windows: $Version (* OUTPUT: *) (* 14.0.0 for Microsoft Windows (64-bit) (December 13, 2023) *) When I create a new notebook (`File -> New -> Notebook`) in the front end, the magnification is set to 100% by default, as indicated in the bottom right-hand corner of the notebook window. **I'd like the magnification of new notebooks to instead be set to 75% by default.** Should I do this using the Options Inspector in the front end? For example, should I do the following steps (referenced [here][1]) in the Options Inspector in the front end? 1. In the front end, choose `Format -> Options Inspector...` 2. Set `Show option values` to `Global Preferences`. 3. Go to `Notebook Options -> Display Options` in the left-hand pane. 4. In the right-hand pane, change the value of `Magnification` from `1.0` to `0.75`. **Or is there another approach I should take?** [1]: https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/a/1311/ Andrew D 2025-08-15T20:58:16Z