I’m trying to resolve Proposition 1 from the article below(page 4).
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1506.04656.pdf
Thank you.
I’m trying to resolve Proposition 1 from the article below(page 4).
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1506.04656.pdf
Thank you.
I tried in Maple because I have never used Mathematica.
I see it is better for this kind of problems.
You don’t know how much you helped me. This recurrence stressed me a lot last couple of days.
Do you think I could resolve a multivariate recurrence like Lemma1 (page 5) from the same article?
Thank you so much.
Best wishes and regards,
Raluca
Hi Raluca,
well, this is not Maple …
You need to define an equation, i.e. it should read after RSolve x[t+1] == a[t] … In a notebook both operators (= and ==) look very similar.
Regarding your question on multivariate recurrence: I may be completely wrong, but to me this seems equivalent to your first problem. In the solution there is nowhere stated that every element needs to be a scalar.
Regards – Henrik
Thank you Henrick. You lighted me up again.
Regarding the multivariate recurrence it can’t be the same. For example, for the bivariate recurrence t is (t1,t2).
In the same article (page 11), is a bivariate example. Do you think that it could be implemented in Mathematica, eventually in a recurrence plot?