yields a result proportional to (2gt-1)/t^(3/2), with a coefficient involving HeavisideTheta function. Is this a correct result? In principle, the term 1/t^(3/2) does not have a Laplace transform, as it is not integrable at t->0. I do not see how the HeavisideTheta function might change this fact. In addition, if we take g=0, then (g+s)/Sqrt[s] reduces to Sqrt[s], for which MATHEMATICA currently says there is no inverse transform, although older versions returned some expressions proportional to 1/t^(3/2). So, does the InverseLaplaceTransform operate correctly? It would be nice to trust MATHEMATICA, but after such experiences I am no longer sure if I can.
Leslaw
Well, for me this only proves that both LaplaceTransform[] and InverseLaplaceTransform[] make the same mistake. If we consider the expression (g+s)/Sqrt[s] as a sum of g/Sqrt[s] and Sqrt[s] than the inverse of Sqrt[s] obviously does not exist. Also, if we consider (gt-1)/t^(3/2) as a sum of g/Sqrt[t] and -1/t^(3/2), then the Laplace transform of 1/t^(3/2) does not exist, because Exp[-st]/t^(3/2) is not integrable close to t=0.
I am trying transforming and retransforming various other expressions and I am beginning to suspect that both LaplaceTransform[] and InverseLaplaceTransform[] produce nonsense without any warning.
Yes, I do agree (you got a ‘like’ from me!). The Laplace transform of \frac{1}{t^{3/2}} does not exist. And it should not make any difference whether a function f[t] is transformed or f[t] HeavisideTheta[t] and the like. But in fact we find: