and can then display that plotA properly as an arrow by Show or Print.
But now I have to customize the arrow heads, e.g. use something like
Arrowheads[Small]
I can find no way to bring that into my plotA-arrow-curve. It seems that Arrowheads cannot be used as a Directive or Option for Show or the like. Instead it has to precede all Arrow graphics primitives. Probably I have to use a more intelligent form of the Replace-statement above. But I cannot find a legal form for replacing “Line” in plot by “Arrowheads[Small],Arrow” for plotA.
In any case I think that Replace-method is some kind of brute force for drawing a parametric curve as an arrow. Are there better ways?
You just need to remember that graphics primitives are scoped within lists. In addition, operate you pattern matching on larger parts, rather then the Line head. Now that you know these two little details, you can modify it as you will. Look at the small modification I added below
Ja, of course. But I feel to need that adaptive refinement.
The background of my question is, that I have to draw 3D arcs for angles between vectors within large and complex graphics created from many objects and rotation transformations. Hence I do not really want to determine myself, how many segments would be reasonable for each and every angle-arc.
Basically the problem is, that there is nothing like Circle with From/To-Angles for 3D. Hence this must be constructed manually with ParametricPlot3D.
Yes, it’s overkill if that is your one and only need. However, sometimes you don’t know you need something until you realize you can do it. Advertizers think this way.
Yesterday I was pointed out a glaring bug in the package. It’s fixed now.