Hi,
I want to solve system of PDE equations with boundary conditions (image1), but at first, I want to setup a formulation (notebook1). My formulation send an error that “Derivative::novar: [PartialD](f[[Eta]]') cannot be interpreted. A partial derivative requires a subscript differentiation variable.”
Please help me, what can I do?
Best Regards.
image1: original problem equations
hdolhaine
(Hans Dolhaine)
December 13, 2021, 11:32am
2
You should show your code, not the equations. Where is notebook1?
I put my notebook in my discussion, but send to you again.
Thank you.
mehantash code.nb (6.95 KB)
hdolhaine
(Hans Dolhaine)
December 13, 2021, 7:03pm
4
That looks nice. Like calligraphy.
But what do you mean for example by cot[Xi]? Perhaps Cot[[Xi]] ?
I suggest you refomulate your code like
e1 = D[f[et], {et, 3}] + (1 + et Cot[et]) f[\[Eta]] Derivative[f[et], {et, 2}] - (D[f[et`], et])^2
and so on.
An later on you set xi to zero. But there are terms divided by xi, so care is necessary!
hdolhaine
(Hans Dolhaine)
December 13, 2021, 10:50pm
5
The left hand side of equation1 should look like this, do you agree?
e1L = D[f[et], {et, 3}] + (1 + xi Cot[xi]) f[\[Eta]] D[f[et], {et, 2}] - (D[f[et], et])^2 +
9/8 Sin[2 xi]/xi + \[CapitalLambda] Sin[xi]/
xi (\[Theta][\[Eta]] + N\[Phi][et]) + Subscript[k, 1] (3/2 Sin[xi]/xi - D[f[et], et]) +
Subscript[k, 2] ((3/2 Sin[xi]/xi)^2 - (D[f[et], et])^2)
What is Nphi? And what is f[ et ]? In the right hand side you differentiate f with respect to xi, that should give zero, or I do not understand what you want to do.
hdolhaine
(Hans Dolhaine)
December 14, 2021, 12:08am
6
I did some more work. Look at the notebook.
mehantash code-v2.nb (31.4 KB)
Hello Dear Hans
Thank you so much for your attention, thank you very very much for your code, i find my mistake by your code.
Thanks
In the right hand side, differentiate f with respect to xi, that give zero !! i can’t undesrtand what’s wrong and why it give me zero
hdolhaine
(Hans Dolhaine)
December 14, 2021, 10:11am
9
You say f is a function of eta, not xi. So differentiation of f[ et ] with respect to xi gives zero, f does not depend on xi.
No, I think by mistake, f is a function of eta & xi at same time. Now what am I to do?
hdolhaine
(Hans Dolhaine)
December 14, 2021, 1:20pm
11
in this case replace everywhere (!) f[ et ] by f[ et, xi ] :
e1R = xi (D[f[et, xi], et] D[D[f[et, xi], et], xi] - D[f[et, xi], et, et] D[f[et, xi], xi])
And check the notebook I sent. I think there are errors: I didn’t change \ [Eta] always by et, as it must be.
Thank you really so much.