which gives the obvious wrong number 125.
I have tried adding different methods at Predict without any success to predict the correct answer. As a hint I have the option of the following answers: A. 216, B. 218, C. 244, D. 324, E. 220.
How can I find the hidden pattern in general in such kind of problems with mathematica ?
Thank you very much for your reply.
This is really another option by taking the sequence at the begining.
The site you sugest is also very interesting.
it is in principle impossible to guess a missing number, because the missing number could have ANY value, depending on the function used to create the non-missing ones.
Look at this
data = Transpose[{Range[8], {1, 8, 27, 64, 125, y, 343, 512}}]
Now define
f[x_] := Plus @@ Table[
data[[i, 2]] Times @@ Table[
If[j != i, (x - data[[j, 1]])/(data[[i, 1]] - data[[j, 1]]), 1]
, {j, 1, 8}]
, {i, 1, 8}]
Then this f will reproduce all the numbers given
f/@Range[8]
and you may insert for the missing y ANY value you want!
And of course you can as alternative get the given numbers by { x, x^3 }.
Thank you for your answer.
I understand that it is not possible to have a general solution for such problems (although it would be good).
I experimented with another simple case without any result.
For example consider the simple sequence
1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18, 29, ???, 76, 123.
Here the obvious pattern is that the third number is the addition of the previous two i.e. 1+3=4 the forth 4+3=7 etc.
Agreed. However, my biases are that many of those who post such “puzzles” on the internet don’t understand that it is possible to put any value in for the missing number (which might not even be an integer and could be a complex number or anything else).
What one is looking for is a simple/parsimonious function to reproduce the (usually) integers given. One has to look for such simple functions to pass college entrance exams as such “puzzles” are included. (Well, 40 years ago they were.)