x^(2 (1 + [Alpha]) ) D[u[x, t],{ x,2}] - t u[x, t] == 0
How about DSolve:
DSolve[x^(2 (1 + \[Alpha])) D[u[x, t], x] - t u[x, t] == 0,
u[x, t], x]
The former input was wrong, I modified it and the equation is still solvable.
Here is a workaround:
eq = x^(2 (1 + \[Alpha])) D[u[x], {x, 2}] - t u[x];
sol = Simplify[
Block[{\[Alpha] = E}, DSolve[eq == 0, u, x] // First] /.
E -> \[Alpha]]
FullSimplify[eq /. sol, t > 0 && x > 0]
Oh, that’s too cute! +1
![]()
In general, I’d suggest using another transcendental constant, one that is less likely to show up in the solution of a differential equation so that the back substitution E -> α doesn’t clobber an exponential function. (Examples: EulerGamma, Catalan, Zeta[7],…, but not Pi obviously though it, too, will work here.)
Brilliant. That’s the real trouble confusing me.