There are several problems with the way you type the equation in, e.g. no spaces between variables/parameters etc. But even if you fix that, WolframAlpha does not seem to like this integral. Mathematica gives a solution:
DSolve[y'[x] == m - f y[x] Exp[-2 d/c] Exp[m (x^2)/c] - g x Exp[-2 d/c]*Exp[m (x^2)/c], y[x], x]
Many thanks. You can understand now that I have not one but two solutions I’m a little bit worried about which one is the correct one. I will write them out and try to see if I can interpret them. I have a very good idea of what I’m looking for and the correct solution should behave in a certain way that makes physical sense.
no need to double post the question to me and to Mariusz. There are some problems with the way you type in your equations. First of all, the parenthesis do not match up. I suppose there is one missing at the end. Also, Mathematica/WoflramAlpha would probably need to know what the independent variable is (it could be “a”, i.e. y could be a function of a, for example). Also, if you type ax instead of a x the Wolfram Language will take that to be the name of a variable not the product of “a” and “x”.
Even if you fix this, WolframAlpha does not provide a solution. Mathematica and the online products, however, do give you a solution:
DSolve[y'[x] == a (1 - (2 k/c) (y[x] + a x)) (1 - (2/c) (d - (a (x^2)/2))), y[x], x]
I will heed your comments and many thanks. I’m finding it hard to attach physical meaning to this solution. Let me look into subscribing to MMA.
I’m sorry about that missing parenthesis.
Many thanks. I had already downloaded and installed Wolfram CDF Player so I was able to open the attachment you sent me. Many thanks. I’m a bit taken aback by how complicated the answer is. The answer should be simpler. It’s difficult to attach physical significance to the answer. In the limit as x approaches infinity y should just reduce to “c” but I don’t see that happening.