User Portlet
| Discussions |
|---|
| The InverseFourierSequenceTransform of DiracDelta is found, but not the more correct DiracComb: ![enter image description here][1] Doing the inverse does not work with constant r: ![enter image description here][2] Is this a bug or are... |
| Mathematica 13.3.1 finally fully supports nVIDIA CUDA Toolkit 12.2.1 The CUDADot issue is solved. Tested on Ubuntu 23.04 with nVIDIA 535.98 driver. |
| I solved it by giving 2 complex equations for 2 unknowns zeta and omegaN, as there are 2 complex conjugate poles. And now Mathematica immediately finds the solution. ![enter image description here][1] This method also works for 2 real poles: ... |
| Thank you very much! So I need to specify it like this: In[1]:= Solve[x^3 == (-1)^2, x] Out[1]= {{x -> 1}, {x -> -(-1)^(1/3)}, {x -> (-1)^(2/3)}} |
| Thank you. So from version 12.2.0 onwards, Wolfram does not provide a CUDA paclet anymore and is using the CUDA toolkit from nVIDIA native installation. Good news, no double installation anymore... But please provide a link to the Mathematica... |
| Thank you for this answer Daniel. But what is a generic result? |
| Thank you very much!! I now have paclet 12.0.303 based on CUDA 10.1 working fine with gcc 8.2.0 !! |
| Thank you very much! Finally CUDA 9.1 with Visual Studio 2017 compiler supported :-) But CUDACCompilers is still like in Mathematica 11.2 not funtional. But in SytemInformation Toolkit Version 4. is listed. Should this not be 9.1 ? And the... |
| I contacted Wolfram Support and they suggested the following [8]:= CUDACCompilers[] Out[8]= {} This empty list is a bug in Mathematica 11.2, but we can use CCompilers[] In[9]:= CCompilers[] Out[9]= {{"Name" ->... |
| Thank you very much Marco !! |