User Portlet
| Discussions |
|---|
| You can use Bing AI and Google CPT to make Mathematica code. They will give you a good start, but occasionally you must make a few corrections. ![enter image description here][1] This time the AI pulled off what it promised without error! ... |
| Probably the last update on the 5,500,000 digit computation: Print[7211520/7405568*100., "% done."] 97.37970132743364% done. When it is done, having the same first 5,500,000 digits found in the previous 6,000,000 digit... |
| Ther following question came about from my Mathematica 13.2.1 by feeding the following Wolfram MathWorld reference commands into an AI chat: &[Wolfram Notebook][1] Per Wolfram MathWorld's [MRB constant][2], [Euler-Mascheroni Constant][3]... |
| Sometimes you have to do a little analysis on simpler forms compared to the full expression and make a guess. But come to find out none of this was necessary; see Gianluca Gorni's reply. [1]:... |
| Here it is—a video of the lecture. https://youtu.be/5rqz-qVCjNY The volume is a little low, so turn up your volume. |
| The difference between it and the following rational number is on the order of $10^{-22,426}.$ Further, the difference between it and the much more concise (albeit factored) rational number is on the order of $10^{-7018}.$ &[Wolfram Notebook][1] ... |
| The MRB constant record computations are given [here][1] in the Wolfram community. To help in the loading times of that extensive discussion, I've moved its applications to this separate discussion. **C** *MRB* and its applications ... |
| Does n have to be a positive integer? |
| If I opened the right windows, the Wolfram|Alpha command had an overall 'divided by n,' while the Mathematica command didn't. |
| I was hoping that I could find a grad student that would be willing to investigate my analysis of the MRB constant, as well as my procedural and numerical methods found in the Wolfram Community post, [Try to beat these MRB constant records][1]. I've... |