User Portlet
| Discussions |
|---|
| Thank you Neil For the help and all the explanations. I now have working models with the correct torque exchanges. Greatly appreciate it. |
| Thank you for the explanations! Once I get around to working on it again, I will definitely report back my findings, Though it seems like that is the problem, namely lack of proper `Real.Output` |
| I would like to simulate a body with internal components connected to a spherical joint that should only freely move within a specific angle range, for example, in each degree of freedom, between +/- 45 degrees. This would be similar I suppose to... |
| Thank you for the resources! The book I've already started to go through, and the Web-U I will sign up for and watch. |
| Hello Niel, Thanks for the help! I will try this verison and see if I can get it to work... Though, I had a realisation moment, maybe you have an idea....The proposed controller will reduce the feedrate of the saw, as the breaking force gets too... |
| Thank you very much. This has taken some time for me to get back to...in the end I ended up using the planer mechanics example to get the solution. But I will take this advice to heart. Algebraic loops were a frustrating thing to understand, I... |
| If you're willing to add an extra step or two, you can simply generate the code in Wiring and copy and paste it into the arduino IDE and then upload...you can then use the MCkit to generate code for *any* compatible board, I rarely have to modify it... |
| Neil! Wow thanks for the help....or I guess doing the entire model for me. I never would have come up with the idea to use the line force. Maybe you could answer another question for me.... When setting the initial conditions and the unstretched... |
| Thank you for the help [@Suba Thomas][at0] ! I will send an email for sure. [at0]: https://community.wolfram.com/web/subat |
| I just recently updated from version 11.2 -> 12...there apparently are quite a few changes since 11.2.... One being how version >11.3 deal with numbers that approach zero. I have been using the "bump" equation that is [demonstrated in the... |