User Portlet
| Discussions |
|---|
| Thanks for a fun game! Some quick thoughts: 1) If you use a TextGrid (instead of Grid) with a monospaced font you can avoid the line lengths differing (as they do in the picture at the top of your post). 2) The While logic is can be simplified... |
| Looks like the Paclet/GPIO problem hasn't been resolved yet. Have tried several versions of Raspbian with the RPi 3 Model B Rev 1.2, and so far have found that stretch v9.3 with kernel 4.9.59-v7 and jessie v8.0 with kernel 4.4.50-v7+ both work with... |
| Thanks Gianluca! Of course, I meant to index v from 1 to 5 not 0 to 4. Comes from spending the past 2 months programming in Racket and Rust... how quickly I forget. :-/ |
| The support folks at Wolfram have let me know that the issue is fixed in 11.1. They are working on fixes for earlier versions. |
| Hi Marco, Thanks for your thoughts. I fixed the typo and got your code to run on 1000 stars... very nice. Thanks for a thought-provoking article! Regards, -Joe |
| When i tried to copy paste the code that includes Ctrl+= text boxes. it generated many lines of code. So, to keep the question clear, i took a screenshot of the command. |
| Removing AppendTo did speed it up! The following code completed in just under 6 minutes... thanks Frank! ClearAll[blumblumshub, makelines, vectorXprod, euler165] blumblumshub[n_] := Mod[Rest@NestList[Mod[#^2, 50515093] &, 290797,... |
| I am attempting to use the Text Search function... I cannot get the b[[i]] to cycle through all the i's the table function. It has something to do with the hold rest attribute for rule delayed symbol in the last line of code. Can someone help me? ... |
| In "CumulativeReturn" distributions are supposed to be reinvested. However, because of double counting, distributions get reinvested twice. "CumulativeFractionalChange" gives you a cumulative return with reinvested distributions, while its original... |
| For loops are slow. I'm not sure why, but I never use them. Mathematica has a function called Do, which are like a For loop. Use that instead. For exists, as far as I know, because of popular demand for something that looked exactly like C's For... |