User Portlet
| Discussions |
|---|
| Thanks, Mariuz. Yes, it did fix it. However, I thought that the 'ComplexExpand' command for the 'displacement' should have resulted in the form u1 + i.u2 ![enter image description here][1] whereby, the 'Real & Imaginary parts (u1 & u2)... |
| The ![enter image description here][1] expression is not complicated ![enter image description here][2] So as I want the DSolve (Integration with respect to Theta) to result in three terms as follows; ![enter image description here][3] ... |
| Thanks, Craig Very helpful, and it fixed my code! |
| Thank for your help. Yes, I had also tried changing the code, as there are two DEs with one BC associated with each. But both the DEs are related, in a way creates a non-solvable loop, at least this is what it seems. There will be way to set up the... |
| Thanks Jim. Yes, I figured it that the integration limits were to be changed in order to avoid this issue. The code works now! |
| Hi Daniel. Thanks for clarifying it further. My code is fixed and works now! Very much appreciated. -Aslam |