User Portlet
| Discussions |
|---|
| I am making a blog about important scientists and mathematicians (sort of an encyclopedia with biographical details about various authors) and I was making one section about Stephen Wolfram. I have the habit of making a list of countries where... |
| I am doing a bit of research in Wolfram Physics model and I would like to include this in a blog about pop-science. There is a section about the "Research Network" where I would like to indicate the persons involved in this project and all the... |
| Very interesting analysis. Do you think that Wolfram's ideas are very similar to Max Tegmark's (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_universe_hypothesis) who, basically, is a platonist physicist that proposes that all mathematical structures... |
| Wolfram's Physics Project is a very interesting one and its recent evolution fascinates me. I think that the recent discovery of the ruliad is a good progress in the project. However, there is something I don't understand: According to Wolfram's... |
| When looking at this book in the Wolfram media page (https://www.wolfram-media.com/products/metamathematics-foundations-and-physicalization/), I noticed that the titles of the chapters of the book are almost identical to the free-accessible writing... |
| Stephen Wolfram recently wrote an interesting article about his proposed relationship between mathematics and physics... |
| I have a few questions about Wolfram's theory for fundamental physics that I would like to clarify... I. First, as I understand it, and please correct me if I'm wrong, is that similar observers to us will most likely perceive at least the same... |
| Are the four paradigms of science described in this Stephen Wolfram's writing (https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2021/09/even-beyond-physics-introducing-multicomputation-as-a-fourth-general-paradigm-for-theoretical-science/) more general as we... |
| At the Wolfram Physics Project Q&A site, there is a question asking whether the model/framework is falsifiable. The answer is: * > Any particular rule could be proved wrong by disagreeing with > observations, for example predicting particles... |