User Portlet User Portlet

Todd Rowland
Discussions
There are many different kinds of groups, and some have better ways of doing them in Wolfram Language. For finite groups there are permutation representations (see the [tutorial][1]) For continuous groups with matrix representations, you could go...
Here's an idea for a new function. I don't know what its name should be but it would be nice to make some of the graphics you see in [A New Kind of Science (Wolfram 2002)][1] like this one of rule 1599 ![code 1599][2] like the one found on...
Thanks Mark for posting this summary of the World Cup. I wonder about kids and passing, because I have seen them do it in practice. Maybe because the reliable distance of their passes is smaller, they need more players on the field. In the above...
![enter image description here][1] - Congratulations! This post is now a [Staff Pick][2] as distinguished by a badge on [your profile][3]! Thank you, keep it coming! [1]:...
Unfortunately this neat idea is unlikely to work. The parameters are the values of each letter and the base value, which would be 27 variables (or maybe a few more letters used in languages besides English), but the number of equations that would...
I think you probably want to define your own function, because the builtin functions (that I am aware of) behave differently. For example, it could be (to get n bits) Two[n_,x_]:=IntegerDigits[2^n-x,2,n] Note that BaseForm is good for...
I was thinking this could be a classroom discussion idea, but I would also be interested in what people think (or what any machine thinks). How much of a pie is a slice of pie? or what is the maximum before any more pie counts as too much pie. ...
Notice that these also work: In[1]:= StringDelete[".del"] /@ {"a.del","b.del","c.del"} Out[1]= {a,b,c} In[2]:= StringDelete[".del"][{"a.del","b.del","c.del"}] Out[2]= {a,b,c} In[3]:=...
![enter image description here][3] - Congratulations! This post is now a [Staff Pick][1]! Thank you for your wonderful contributions. Please, keep them coming! [1]: http://community.wolfram.com/content?curTag=staff+picks [3]:...
I think the problem is that, if you were doing this with tensor operations only, is that you would need a contraction operation akin to Diagonal. It seems like the syntax (currently allowed) for [PartLayer][1] is insufficient for this. Take the...