User Portlet User Portlet

Discussions
OK, WorkingPrecision works, but not AccuracyGoal. What's the difference i.e. why would AccuracyGoal refuse to produce more significant digits, is it because WorkingPrecision is some sort of brute force?
Thank you David.
Yes, here is a Notebook with 3 Integrals, two of them with just a difference in symbol ("q1" instead of "a"). Also (reply to another post) the Integrals are not all necessarily divergent, all variables are Real and greater than 0.
Hennrik, On a completely separate note, how do you typset your post to include such nice math symbols?
Yes Bill, that's it. I have no idea why my browser can't render the Mathematica display (firefox and chrome).
Thank you Marco! [Thanks everyone who replied] This is exactly what I needed: Question: Is the command "Manipulate" enough/essential to check where the graph exists i.e. what the constraints on the three variables are?
Assuming[{p, m, \[CapitalLambda], k} \[Element] Reals, Integrate[k/(2 (k^2 + m^2) (-k + p)), {p, 0, \[CapitalLambda]}]] Mathematica's answer is ConditionalExpression[(k Log[1 - \[CapitalLambda]/k])/(2 (k^2 + m^2)), \[CapitalLambda] == 0 ||...
The integrals (especially the first one) is pretty straightforward if done by partial fractions -- indicated in my earlier mail. p^2/(p^2 - k^2) = (p^2 + k^2 - k^2)/((p + k) (p - k)) = 1 + k^2/((p + k) (p - k)) For certain cases where Em
Appreciate tips on how write a Mathematica script that would  1. Wait for user input, that contains a long string which includes blank spaces, i.e. no commas etc.   2. Do an integral over a predefined variable using input from Step 1.   3. Use...
Hello, There is no problem solving this integral: Integrate[DiracDelta[k1 - pm] DiracDelta[-k1 + q1] w[pm, m],{pm,-Infinity,Infinity}]which gives [mcode]ConditionalExpression[DiracDelta[-k1 + q1] w[k1, m], k1 \[Element]...