Message Boards Message Boards

GROUPS:

Curious behavior of EllipticF for complex-valued arguments

Posted 1 month ago
146 Views
|
0 Replies
|
2 Total Likes
|

It appears that MMA produces unexpected evaluations for incomplete elliptic integrals of the first kind for complex-valued arguments. Naively speaking, one would define EllipticF for complex-valued arguments by analytically continuing its standard integral representation. However, numerical experiments (see attached file) reveal that EllipticF evaluations sometimes differ from this integral representation by an amount of 2EllipticK.

I have a hunch that MMA evaluates EllipticF for generic inputs by numerically inverting JacobiAmplitude (the latter function has period 2EllipticK, which explains the aforementioned offset), rather than adhering to a more straightforward integral representation. Is that the case?

Reply to this discussion
Community posts can be styled and formatted using the Markdown syntax.
Reply Preview
Attachments
Remove
or Discard

Group Abstract Group Abstract