Group Abstract Group Abstract

Message Boards Message Boards

0
|
12.6K Views
|
6 Replies
|
1 Total Like
View groups...
Share
Share this post:

When constructing space, is a "meta-space" needed?

Posted 6 years ago

Hello,

In the Wolfram model, physical space is a network of points (or nodes). But usually points are located somewhere, just like we draw points on a piece of paper. So where are those points in Wolfram model located? In a "meta-space"? If yes, what is the nature of this meta-space? (Is it continuous?) If no, how should the construction of the network of points be understood?

Thanks.

Wyman

POSTED BY: Wyman Kwok
6 Replies
Posted 5 years ago
POSTED BY: Jeff Yates
POSTED BY: Zolmeister Zman
Posted 6 years ago

We indeed don't need to embed the vertices in anything, however, computing dimensionality is slightly more complicated than you described. You need to consider balls (graph neighborhoods) of different radii starting from the same vertex, and see how quickly their volumes (vertex counts) grow. If they grow as a third power of the radius, for example, we have a 3-dimensional space.

POSTED BY: Max Piskunov
Posted 6 years ago

Thanks. I take what you mean is that the vertices in Wolfram model are in fact not embedded in anything. But I just want to note that the graphs (or hypergraphs) actually have the vertices embedded in a space (i.e. the space on which the graphs are drawn).

POSTED BY: Wyman Kwok
Posted 6 years ago

That's purely for visualization purposes, it does not have any physical significance.

POSTED BY: Max Piskunov
Reply to this discussion
Community posts can be styled and formatted using the Markdown syntax.
Reply Preview
Attachments
Remove
or Discard