Group Abstract Group Abstract

Message Boards Message Boards

0
|
4.4K Views
|
2 Replies
|
1 Total Like
View groups...
Share
Share this post:

Inverse Fourier Series Transform

Posted 5 years ago

Why is my result different from what the teacher does when I used Inverse Fourier Transformer?

Attachments:
POSTED BY: Sheng Dai
2 Replies

There is an option FourierPrameters which controls which convention is in use for the FT and IFT. The one in the book differs from the default behavior of InverseFourierTransform. Also there is a need to make an assumption about the parameter a in order to have convergence of the underlying integral.

InverseFourierTransform[1/(a + 2 I f \[Pi]), f, t, 
 FourierParameters -> {0, -2 Pi}, Assumptions -> Re[a] > 0]

(* Out[13]= E^(-a t) HeavisideTheta[2 \[Pi] t] *)

Note that this is equivalent to the textbook result since the HeavisideTheta function makes its transition at the origin for either result.

POSTED BY: Daniel Lichtblau
Anonymous User
Anonymous User
Posted 5 years ago

This should give you an idea. The output simplified, used as input, gives your orig. function except with rules. Fourier tables in books are a little infamous for not all being in the same form (and some being incorrect "in ways").

In:  FourierTransform[(
        E^((a x)/(2 \[Pi])) HeavisideTheta[-x Sign[Re[a]]] Sign[Re[a]])/
        Sqrt[2 \[Pi]], x, w] // Simplify
Out:  1/(a + 2 I \[Pi] w) /; Re[a] != 0
POSTED BY: Anonymous User
Reply to this discussion
Community posts can be styled and formatted using the Markdown syntax.
Reply Preview
Attachments
Remove
or Discard