Group Abstract Group Abstract

Message Boards Message Boards

Error message when submitting to the Prompt Repository: "disallowed symbols"

I am getting an error message when trying to submit a prompt to the Prompt Repository. The message I am getting is "The content of the request contains disallowed symbols: \ {System`TerminatedEvaluation}." I'm not using any exotic symbols, so I don't know what's going on.

I'm also getting a message that the notebook takes up 5.8 MB of memory, and I don't know what that is about.
POSTED BY: Kathryn Cramer
10 Replies
Sort By:

Kathryn, I took the liberty of trying to make the discussion prompt work in a templated way:

https://www.wolframcloud.com/obj/bobs/DeployedResources/Prompt/PanelDiscussion/

This is in my cloud account, not the public prompt repository. Feel free to use this as inspiration to submit a prompt to the repository.

You can use the Source Notebook link there to get my original notebook
POSTED BY: Bob Sandheinrich

I am playing around with this. Any idea why if I write the function to have three panelists (plus the moderator) rather than two, that it ignores the first one?

(In this example, I have included defaults for each of the slots.)

Attachments:
PanelDiscussion2...nb
POSTED BY: Kathryn Cramer

I now can upload submissions to the prompt repository.

If we can get the panel discussion prompt to allow for a 3rd panelist, I'd like to do that. Otherwise it can be tidied a little and be submitted with 2 panelists, a moderator, and a topic.
POSTED BY: Kathryn Cramer

This version has four in the conversation and works with my Setting prompt. (https://www.wolframcloud.com/obj/kathryn.cramer0/DeployedResources/Prompt/Setting/)
POSTED BY: Kathryn Cramer
POSTED BY: Kathryn Cramer
POSTED BY: Kathryn Cramer

I'm not sure what is causing the TerminatedEvaluation issue. Which Wolfram Language version are you using? 13.2 or 13.3?

I recommend trying: Delete and recreate all the example outputs (don't just re-evaluate, delete the old outputs cells first). Deleting all the cells from the "Author Notes" section

See if that helps.

By the way, this is a nice idea for a prompt. I like it. But, the reviewers will probably tell you that "Discussion" is too generic of a prompt name. Every interaction with an LLM is a discussion. Maybe call it something like DiscussionSimulate.
POSTED BY: Bob Sandheinrich

I had in mind to make it do the panel discussions that I was able to simulate with GPT-3 (which are much harder to do in ChatGPT & GPT-4), but I couldn't get that to work.

The initial version of the prompt had 3 panelists and a moderator and a specific topic. I just kept scaling it back until it did run.

I now have 3 or 4 more. Additionally, I have a prompt for setting and for topic, which are Modifiers, plus Modifiers that do a Causal Layered Analysis and a SWOT analysis. Mysteriously, the SWOT will run as a chat thing but not programmatically. The other 3 work.enter image description here
POSTED BY: Kathryn Cramer

Look at the LLMEvaluator option to give greater control (GPT3.5 vs 4) in programmatic use. Maybe that is the difference?

#Setting is a great idea for a prompt, it will be useful along with many different prompts.
POSTED BY: Bob Sandheinrich

The size issue is due to the icon image. It is 1200x1200 which is larger than you need for a simple icon. You should reduce the resolution (with Rasterize or ImageResize).
POSTED BY: Bob Sandheinrich
Reply to this discussion
Community posts can be styled and formatted using the Markdown syntax.
Tag limit exceeded
Note: Only the first five people you tag will receive an email notification; the other tagged names will appear as links to their profiles.
Reply Preview
Attachments
Remove
or Discard