Message Boards Message Boards

0
|
1416 Views
|
0 Replies
|
0 Total Likes
View groups...
Share
Share this post:

A New Version of an Old Approach to Fundamental Physics

Posted 1 year ago

I would like to mention a word at this moment - "Aether." If anyone feels uncomfortable with this word, kindly refrain from reading further.

Wolfram is a powerful tool that can manipulate geometric shapes and create new units of measurement. However, it lacks a fundamental physics paradigm based on geometry and a comprehensive unit system that can make understanding fundamental physics as intuitive as Classical Mechanics.

I have dedicated more than two decades to creating a revolutionary physics system that leads us back to the concept of Aether, which was wrongly discarded in the early 1900s. I've authored a book on this topic, which can be accessed for free at sota.aetherwizard.com. This new approach enables a simple Unified Force Theory based on Newtonian force laws, while also quantifying Einstein's General Relativity equations in terms of matter-Aether tensors. Moreover, this physics system introduces new units of measurement based on distributed charge and two different types of charges: electrostatic and magnetic.

It is significant to note that space can be measured as a quantum structure that includes geometry and spin. We can even create a model of space using five dimensions that is easily understandable for high school students. This model helps us understand the structure of subatomic particles and how matter interacts with space (Aether).

This forum aims to quantify fundamental physics in significant ways, and I possess the crucial concepts that can facilitate this goal. However, mainstream academia seems to hold a significant irrational bias towards the concept of quantum and fluid space. This should not be the case because it is precisely what Henri Poincare and Hendrik Lorentz were quantifying when they developed the Lorentz transformations. Furthermore, Albert Einstein's General Relativity theory unintentionally presents a powerful fluid Aether theory as well.

I have a fixed income and only possess a GED high school diploma, but I have spent the last forty years reading books and scientific papers. Unfortunately, my severe hearing loss prevents me from engaging in meaningful voice conversations. Despite this, I have no intention of selling anything, asserting authority, or belittling anyone. I have simply discovered some highly practical and straightforward physics concepts using ideas that others discarded over a century ago.

I am seeking open-minded individuals who value functional ideas over diplomas on a wall. My goal is to enhance my visual aids to help others better understand new concepts in physics. I aim to create new physics calculators that focus on dimensional analysis, reducing the reliance on abstract calculus and leading to less abstract paradigms.

Is there anyone present who is open to giving a new idea a fair chance?

POSTED BY: David Thomson
Reply to this discussion
Community posts can be styled and formatted using the Markdown syntax.
Reply Preview
Attachments
Remove
or Discard

Group Abstract Group Abstract