If I scrape his code, paste it into a notebook, restore all the missing \ in front of his [Rho], [Alpha], etc, (which I've noticed get eaten by the posting software if I attempt to do any editing of a previous post, it would be very very nice if the editing process would not do that), check the results of each step for any obvious warning signs and peek at the system that he will give to NDSolve to find enf1 the second time, just before I actually try that NDSolve, then I notice one of his items in that system is
In[50]:= ttf[0, r, t] == tme
Out[50]= False
Giving NDSolve a system that includes False as one of the items would be the first thing I would look at if I were trying to figure out why it wasn't working.
