Thanks so much for all your replies :)
Eric asked:
"Now, I'm not totally sure I understood your constraints. Maybe you meant that no permutation should show up more than once anywhere."
This is exactly what I meant :)
I'm not expecting many combinations, especially with fewer persons and letters.
Perhaps this is constructing a Latin square or a disjoint set of permutations where each person's sequence is unique both within and across combinations?
Here's the first 4 combinations for 5 persons and 5 letters.
Combination 1
Person 1: a, b, c, d, e
Person 2: b, a, d, e, c
Person 3: c, d, e, a, b
Person 4: d, e, b, c, a
Person 5: e, c, a, b, d
Combination 2
Person 1: a, b, c, e, d
Person 2: b, a, d, c, e
Person 3: c, d, e, b, a
Person 4: d, e, b, a, c
Person 5: e, c, a, d, b
Combination 3
Person 1: a, b, d, c, e
Person 2: b, a, c, e, d
Person 3: c, e, a, d, b
Person 4: d, c, e, b, a
Person 5: e, d, b, a, c
Combination 4
Person 1: a, b, d, e, c
Person 2: b, a, c, d, e
Person 3: c, e, a, b, d
Person 4: d, c, e, a, b
Person 5: e, d, b, c, a
Ideally, whenever possible the valid combinations would be moved around between the persons so that the same beginning letter for a person is only used as little as possible.
Combination 1
Person 1: a, b, c, d, e
Person 2: b, a, d, e, c
Person 3: c, d, e, a, b
Person 4: d, e, b, c, a
Person 5: e, c, a, b, d
Combination 2
Person 1: b, a, d, c, e (actually person 2 result)
Person 2: a, b, c, e, d (actually person 1 result)
Person 3: d, e, b, a, c (actually person 4 result)
Person 4: c, d, e, b, a (actually person 3 result)
Person 5: e, c, a, d, b (not possible to move to another person)
Thank you.