Hello, good morning. My name is José Luis, and I'm a computer scientist with a passion for physics. The reason for my message is to have this cosmological model I've created validated by physics experts like yourselves, to see if it makes sense or if it's just nonsense. The model attempts to answer the ontological question: why something and not nothing? Because two opposing strings rotating in opposite directions to annihilate each other always leave a geometric residue of minimum action 1/(2π). The model has already demonstrated geometrically that all of physics can be derived from this idea, specifically, from a single string with tension Ts and length ℓs. (If you consult Appendix 6, you'll understand better; I've derived the 32 cosmological constants using the parent constant TS/ls^2). Furthermore, this irreducible angular residue δ = 1/(2π) generates a 2D→3D toroidal projection with two dilutions: a linear one (≈1.703) for charge/electromagnetism and a volumetric one (≈1.974) at the cosmological/mass level. (These are two ways of viewing the same string, one non-projective and the other projective; the entire model is closed with no free parameters within its geometry.) The cycles (we are currently in cycle 78) refine the geometric residue and naturally explain the Hubble tension (∼8% arc of the current cycle), in addition to converging asymptotically and eliminating the singularities of black holes. The Standard Model masses, the MOND acceleration (a₀), and even the early formation of carbon and oxygen (JWST) are explained solely by this ontological premise and fractal recursion. The complete template is available for free on Google Books (search "BULNPQS"). I have also added the docx files for the most relevant appendices of the template to the following link for your review and download. BULNPQS Drive: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1XYAsmwS8Oey2uGY5pdKCxc62MMf-PEtT?usp=sharing I have also uploaded the files to Deepseek AI and shared the thread so you can ask any questions directly and avoid wasting time translating or reading: https://chat.deepseek.com/share/b9p237e3grnpxgkvgy Thank you, I hope this provides some useful information, and if not, please excuse the inconvenience.

I can't reply to your message, so I'll leave the answer here: Thanks for the reply. I've been careful not to add layers of complexity so the concept is clear. I'm not a physicist in the traditional sense; I'm a computer scientist. But if you look closely, a simple ts/ls^2 reparametrization explains the 30 assumed physical constants. Furthermore, a toroidal geometry (Appendix 6), a planar and self-similar residue refinement (Appendix 10), and the Hubble and Hardy strains as an 8% arc of the current cycle, gravitational echoes of black hole mergers in 0.05 seconds, and growth in structure 1.236 are all inferred. Any physicist starting from the model can create the corresponding Lagrangians. I simply didn't create them to avoid adding complexity. Appendices 11 (covariance, Friedmann) and 11.1 (black holes) provide the foundation for anyone to develop them, but just by analyzing Appendix 6, you can understand how the universe works: linear 3D and volumetric 3D projection. I'm not a physicist, so I offer a different perspective that a physicist might not see because I analyze everything from a different point of view. Thanks for your reply. I've shared the entire model under a free license so that anyone can develop their own models based on it. The algebra is closed. Appendix 6 is where you should start if you want to see how this algebra derives the single chord and the double toroidal projection (just ask Depseek for the table of formulas in Appendix 6 with the 30 constant formulas, and you'll see how everything is related). You'll also discover that the gravitational base tension derives the four fundamental forces, and you'll see the cycle when you verify that t_s (light stress) / t_s (gravitational stress) = 2π. Thank you very much.