Complaint: The examples in the Mathematica Help are needlessly complicated, and in fact hinder the process of informing the user. Here's an example:

The first example of the use of Parallelize, in the definition of the Parallelize operation, is

(1)  Parallelize[Map[Composition[Framed,FactorInteger],{1,11,111,1111,11111,111111}]]

This is more or less

(2) Parallelize[{FactorInteger[1], FactorInteger[11], FactorInteger[111], FactorInteger[1111], FactorInteger[11111], FactorInteger[111111]}]

Which takes about 50% more characters, but only two operators (Parallelize and FactorInteger) instead of five (Parallelize, Map, Composition, Framed, FactorInteger).

But, in fact, neither (1) or (2) tells the reader anything more about what Parallelize does, or how to use it, than

(3) Parallelize[{1^2, 2^2, 3^2, 4^2, 5^2, 6^2}]

(3) has no operators other than the one which the example is there to explain. And it has fewer characters than (1) or (2).

Can anyone defend why (1) should be the example instead of (3).