Message Boards

9253 Views

5 Replies

14 Total Likes

View groups...

Follow this post

Share this post:

GROUPS:

Wolfram Science Software Development Equation Solving Wolfram Language

New function suggestion: Dont

Todd Rowland, Zeta Cubed

Posted 9 years ago

In the spirit of using WL to talk to AI, this function should be useful, It is like Do except it tells the program what not to do. A simple example might be Dont[Outer[Divide, Range[-5,5], Range[-5,5]], DivideByZero] There are versions already in the language, like when you solve a differential equation you can stop it under some conditions, and of course there is Break. One might think this is silly but because of computational irreducibility it is impossible to always predict when something bad will happen.

POSTED BY: Todd Rowland

5 Replies

Sort By:

Posted 9 years ago

Here is an example, creating function from it won't be easy if it is meant to be general, but is certainly possible: Internal`InheritedBlock[{Divide}, Unprotect@Divide; Divide[x_, 0] := Inactive[Divide][x, 0]; Outer[Divide, Range[-1, 1], Range[-1, 1]] ] {{1, Inactive[Divide][-1, 0], -1}, {0, Inactive[Divide][0, 0], 0}, {-1, Inactive[Divide][1, 0], 1}}

POSTED BY: Kuba Podkalicki

Posted 9 years ago

Good question Sander. It could be Inactive code taking the place whenever the execution tries code which matches the Don't pattern. There could be an expression evaluated, like Check which returns something when a message is generated, but evaluate it in place inside the expression. Another analogy is with the optional second argument to Dynamic. which evaluates when a variable changes its value. In order to give a concrete answer, Dont[Table[2/i, {i,-2,2}], DivideByZero] might return {-1 -1/2, Inactive[Divide][2,0], 1/2, 1}