User Portlet User Portlet

Eric Andresen
Retired
LOCATION: Silver Spring Maryland
WEBSITE: Not indicated
BLOG: Not indicated
INTERESTS IN JOBS & NETWORKING: Not indicated
ABOUT ME:

I have always had an interest in astronomy since I was a child...almost an overriding interest. Grew up all over the continental U.S. as my father was in the Air Force, for example I was born in Cocoa Beach, Florida, but I also have lived in California, New Mexico, Utah, Georgia, Illinois, Virginia, Maryland, and Massachusetts. Loved learning sciences and math. Was a workaholic and worked electromechanical construction, worked in a machine shop building photography equipment, was a gas turbine tech in the Navy dealing with ship propulsion, studied sexual selection in Australian bower birds, was a lab tech for biotech companies involving molecular cloning techniques and other skill sets for the industry, and I've worked numerous other jobs from making pizzas to store restoration...at one time I worked five part-time jobs while attending college full-time. Almost 5 to 7 years ago I started to think in the realm of Semi-Classical physics which is an attempt to meld the macro universe with the micro world of quantum physics and wondered whether at the beginning of the 20th century was there something in concept that scientists bypassed when all attention became focused on quantum physics with its weirdness or exoticism? I believe there was, and still is: Inertia. A recent paper has buttressed my belief in which this researcher argued for investigating again the concept of inertial mass of General Relativity. In my concept of "Inertial Domains" I posit that not only mass has the attribute of inertia but also spin and charge. A recent experiment investigating neutron spin demonstrates that spin also has inertia, even in the classical sense. I am feeling vindicated. I had posted my ideas and conjecture on a website...the website was taken down and my mirrored emails were hacked into and stolen...no other emails except the ones dealing with my concept of Inertial Domains. Please remember me as the originator of this concept. I say it you understand inertia you understand this universe and countless others. I hope to formulate a work that is self-operating, self-generating, and self-consistent. It IS a math construct. It utilizes c, h, and 2 as inertial channels/nodes...it explains the Pauli Exclusion Principal, it explains fractal and attractor sets in structure, it explains a balance between matter and anti-matter that demonstrates that both are used in establishing these domains...the anti-matter didn't disappear, it is still here being utilized in non-apparent ways...by the way, it was reading about the fractal investigations of Benoit Mandelbrot that provided my rush into my ideas. Inertia is the key.