User Portlet
I am not anyone in particular. I am not a Scientist, a Math Master or anything like that. I am just a man with questions, and possible answers I can't even prove or disprove because I lack the mathematics to validate my concepts.
It came to me that I think current particle physics theory might be incredibly wrong and completely off track. When just thinking about the use of particle accelerators to "find" what particles are made of, I think there is a major flaw in the basic concept!
Imagine trying to find out what a Ford 150 pick-up truck is made of by constantly slamming Ford 150's into each other at high speed? Or what a bowling ball is made of by shooting them at each other. It just won't work! Obviously you can tell I am just thinking in terms of common sense and not physics.
Now take it further, and think of slamming protons or neutrons together at speeds as close to the speed of light as you can get! In an environment where mass and energy are equally interchangeable! The detection you are getting prove ...what? I don't get it?
Especially when a neutron will break down on its own into 3 parts, because it really doesn't exist, or at least that's my theory although I lack the math, and science to prove it.
Still, if I am right, I can explain the weak and strong nuclear forces, why there is no Atomic Number 3 and 5, and why heavier Elements are "radioactive and "break down". Can current Particle Physics do this?
What surprised me was when I heard a theory of quark attraction involving the "passing" of materials back and forth! Granted I don't understand everything about the new Physics Theory, but I'm not stupid. If two people pass a football back and forth, they can still keep getting further and further away from each other until either on keeps the ball and goes his own way, or the ball falls short and both go their own way. A theory regarding this as being a reason for attraction, would require proof that they both have to have the ball for a period of time, but not all of the time! Not very likely.
So I am here to see if anyone is interesting in doing a little math and making me look like an idiot, or giving people something to think about. Someone once told me to "keep things simple - stupid" and for most of my life this philosophy has been more than adequate.
I think the difference is that I think of Science as seeing and explaining how God did it, while far too many people want to prove that everything happened by itself. A very, very funny, silly and foolish notion. Just think of the "Big Bang". If you had a point, less than a point of nothing, and there was nothing else, then it would remain nothing by definition and the Law of Physics! You need a external, internal, or some kind of outside force to change its state.
If that force was an un-directed force the explosion would just have continued outward, Light, even though it has a little mass, would not have enough gravitational pull to create anything big enough redirect the force of the explosion. Note also, it would require a continued emission of light to even cause photon collisions to create even the smallest of particles! Am I right? Would not a single burst of light just continue outward like a laser and the photons wouldn't even touch.
No, an intelligence had to guide the force into creating what it desired. This intelligence had to create the rules, or there just wouldn't be any! A very exciting prospect! It means that our "space-time" existence does not in any way have to be the same as another.s?!
Sorry this is all strange for a Bio! I am just trying to show why the world's biggest under-achiever is here.