# [✓] Tetration function in Wolfram?Alpha?

Posted 2 years ago
4812 Views
|
4 Replies
|
3 Total Likes
|
 Is there any way to enter tetration in WolframAlpha, in such a way that I can use it with the limit function? More specific, can I make Wolfram Alpha calculate the limit of sqrt(2)^sqrt(2)^sqrt(2)^sqrt(2)^... You get it? And i know it will be 2, i just wanted to ask for the general case.
4 Replies
Sort By:
Posted 2 years ago
 One can enter solve sqrt(2)^x=x and obtain a result from W|A. It seems that W|A will not handle the more general case of a^x=x, though Mathematica is fine with it. In[63]:= Solve[a^x == x, x] During evaluation of In[63]:= Solve::ifun: Inverse functions are being used by Solve, so some solutions may not be found; use Reduce for complete solution information. Out[63]= {{x -> -(ProductLog[-Log[a]]/Log[a])}} This does not fully address the question since it is a multivalued result, so one must figure out which case is correct for the limit problem at hand.
Posted 2 years ago
 Observe - despite this argument has a weakness if repeated - that (because of $\infty-1=\infty$) one might single out one term $\sqrt2$ from a=Sqrt[2]^Sqrt[2]^Sqrt[2]^... coming to In[1]:= Solve[Sqrt[2]^a == a, a] Out[1]= {{a -> 2}, {a -> -((2 ProductLog[-1, -(Log[2]/2)])/Log[2])}} 
Posted 2 years ago
 Slightly off-question but I think this can help. I actually did some research on tetration (and extending it to complex realms) some weeks ago and I learnt the following through this Wolfram MathWorld page.The value of the infinite power tower can be computed analytically by writing Taking the logarithm of both sides and plugging back in to obtainSolving for h(z) gives. Where W(z) is the Lambert W-function (Corless et al. 1996). h(z) converges iff e^(-e)<=x<=e^(1/e) (0.0659<=x<=1.4446; OEIS A073230 and A073229), as shown by Euler (1783) and Eisenstein (1844) (Le Lionnais 1983; Wells 1986, p. 35). This function is already in mathematica with the following name:  ProductLog[x] Just to prove it works:I don't know what things you're working on but probably this method will be more efficient than solving for the limit manually. Hope it helped :)
Posted 2 years ago
 This can be seen as a FixedPoint[], after looking into what Mathematica makes out of it In[27]:= Sqrt[2]^Sqrt[2]^Sqrt[2]^Sqrt[2]^Sqrt[2]^Sqrt[2] // FullForm Out[27]=Power[2,Power[2,Plus[-1,Power[2,Plus[-1,Power[2,Plus[-1,Power[2,Plus[-1,Power[2,Rational[-1,2]]]]]]]]]]] and keeping in mind that In[18]:= ((((Sqrt[2]^Sqrt[2])^Sqrt[2])^Sqrt[2])^Sqrt[2])^Sqrt[2] // N Out[18]= 7.10299 diverges, one finds the expression to reach the fixed point is In[30]:= 2^FixedPoint[Power[2, Plus[-1, #]] &, Sqrt[2.]] Out[30]= 2. which can - to return to the question - be entered into W|A. Note In[31]:= FixedPoint[Power[2, Plus[-1, #]] &, Sqrt[2.]] Out[31]= 1. to no surprize.
Community posts can be styled and formatted using the Markdown syntax.