Message Boards Message Boards

[WSS19] Rainforest stewardship through blockchain

Common problem, collective solution Source: Planet.com Source: Planet.com


The necessary planetary stewardship should start around the conservation and restoration of the rainforest. The information from satellite imagery is already freely available and its quality or accuracy will continue to improve; access to new techniques like machine learning or neural networks, and the mainstream adoption of mobile devices in society is allowing better analysis and more effective intervention. In that context, this project focuses on the automation of forest loss detection for any property in the Amazon and its registry into a blockchain, which then will provide that information in real-time to the participants of the network via periodic verifications. In order to get access to the network, a specific contract has to be previously defined. If the requirements of the contract are met, then the owner of the property will receive the agreed payment but if increasing deforestation is detected, there won't be any payment.


IDEA: Computational Resilience

Often times, conservation or sustainability efforts and their discussions are abstract or too focused on nice pictures. Of course, nature is beautiful, but we should incorporate a quantitative approach that could support more effective and systematic execution. Given the tools available now in the XXI century, we could use modern technology to understand and solve critical problems, like the ones happening in the rainforest and cities. In the context of current challenges like climate change and urbanization, the practice of sustainability in a computational way represents a necessary paradigm shift that can be adopted by a wide arrange of professionals. More importantly, if through innovation and entrepreneurship we engage individual users directly, giving them back something valuable, scale and impact could be reached surprisingly fast.

Source: Planet.com Source: Planet.com

1. Registry

There are two main ways to generate information related to potential participants. Depending on the data and know-how available, we should decide for one or the other but ideally, the more automated option should be implemented (Convolutional Neural Networks and permissionless Blockchain). Of course, Google's and Planet's services are one option but not the only one.

2. Contracts

Based on the information generated in the previous step, the property owners will have or not have access to the network (blockchain baked). On the other hand, there also will be contracts working as triggers of the incentives/payments for those who deliver a good performance in terms of reducing or avoiding deforestation.

3. Payments

Depending on the frequency on which the forest data is updated (daily, monthly, or annually), the system will verify the information of all the properties and compare that with its historical data in order to generate an unique order/key through the blockchain, allowing the agreed payment and its traceability, and solving the double accounting issue and the current lack of transparency due to it's spatial explicitly nature.

PROJECT: From forest loss detection to payments for performance using blockchain

DEFINITIONS: image processing and curation of data.


Global forest change data is available online at:

http://earthenginepartners.appspot.com/science-2013-global-forest/download_v1.6.html

The following data files describe forest cover in the year 2000, and forest cover loss between the years 2000 and 2018, in the region from -10 to -20 latitude, and from -70 to -80 longitudes:

https://storage.googleapis.com/earthenginepartners-hansen/GFC-2018-v1 .6/HansenGFC-2018-v1 .6treecover2000 _ 10S_ 080W.tif

https://storage.googleapis.com/earthenginepartners-hansen/GFC-2018-v1 .6/HansenGFC-2018-v1 .6lossyear _ 10S_ 080W.tif

These files have been downloaded to the following directory.

    dir =~/Documents/WSS2019/WSS2019-FinalProject/

The files may be imported in the following manner.

    coverW80 = 
      Import[dir <> 
        "Data-Hansen/Hansen_GFC-2018-v1.6_treecover2000_10S_080W.tif"];

    lossW80 = Import[
       dir <> "Data-Hansen/Hansen_GFC-2018-v1.6_lossyear_10S_080W.tif"];

Each file is an image that is 40000 pixels by 40000 pixels.

    ImageDimensions[coverW80]
    ImageDimensions[lossW80]

    Out[4]= {40000, 40000}

    Out[5]= {40000, 40000}

Therefore, each pixel corresponds to 1/4000 degrees. The following commands convert between pixel coordinates and latitude/longitude.

    LongToPixel[x_] := Round[4000 (x + 80.0)]
    SetAttributes[LongToPixel, Listable]

    PixelToLong[x_] := x/4000.0 - 80
    SetAttributes[PixelToLong, Listable]

    LatToPixel[y_] := Round[-4000 (y + 10.0)]
    SetAttributes[LatToPixel, Listable]

    PixelToLat[y_] := -10 - y/4000.0
    SetAttributes[PixelToLong, Listable]

Use ImportPolygons[filename] to import the polygons in a shape file. The output is a list. The nth member of the list is the set of vertices of the nth polygon. Each vertex is given using pixel coordinates.

    ImportPolygons[file_] := 
     Map[GeoPosition[GeoGridPosition[#, "UTMZone19South"]] &, 
       Cases[Import[file], Polygon[list_, ___] -> list, Infinity], {2}] /. 
      GeoPosition[list_, ___] :> {LongToPixel[list[[2]]], LatToPixel[list[[1]]]}

The command ForestLoss[{lat1, long1}, {lat2, long2}, yrs] provides an image of the forest loss, measured in the years yrs, for the region from {lat1, long1} to {lat2, long2}. Each latitude is expected to be between -10.00025 and -19.97525, inclusive. Each longitude is expected to be between -79.99975 and -70.02475, inclusive. And yrs is expected to be a set of years from 2001 to 2018, inclusive.

    ForestLoss[{lat1_, long1_}, {lat2_, long2_}, yrs_, opts___] := 
     ArrayPlot[ImageData[
       ImageTake[lossW80, LatToPixel[{lat1, lat2}], LongToPixel[{long1, long2}]], 
       "Byte"], ColorFunction -> (If[MemberQ[yrs, 2000 + #], Red, 
          RGBColor[0, 0, 0, 0]] &), ColorFunctionScaling -> False, Frame -> False,
       opts]

The command SatImage[{lat1, long1}, {lat2, long2}] provides a satellite image for the region from {lat1, long1} to {lat2, long2}. Each latitude is expected to be between -10.00025 and -19.97525, inclusive. Each longitude is expected to be between -79.99975 and -70.02475, inclusive.

    SatImage[{lat1_, long1_}, {lat2_, long2_}, opts___] := 
     GeoImage[{GeoPosition[{lat1, long1}], GeoPosition[{lat2, long2}]}, 
      GeoRangePadding -> None, GeoProjection -> "Mercator", opts]

The command PropertyImage[poly, yrs, per] provides an image of the property represented by the polygons poly (as output by ImportPolygons), superimposed on a satellite image, and on an image of the forest loss, measured in the years yrs. The image has a padding of per percent around the property. The latitude of each point in the displayed region is expected to be between -10.00025 and -19.97525, inclusive. The longitude of each point in the displayed region is expected to be between -79.99975 and -70.02475, inclusive. And yrs is expected to be a set of years from 2001 to 2018, inclusive.

    PropertyImage[poly_, yrs_, per_, opts___] :=

     Module[{a, b, c, d, maxlat, maxlong, minlat, minlong, lat, long, loss, 
       property, sat},
      {long, lat} = Transpose[Flatten[poly, 1]];
      maxlong = Max[long];
      minlong = Min[long];
      maxlat = Max[lat];
      minlat = Min[lat];
      {a, b} = {minlong, maxlong} + per/100.0 (maxlong - minlong) {-1, 1};
      {c, d} = {minlat, maxlat} + per/100.0 (maxlat - minlat) {-1, 1};
      sat = SatImage[{PixelToLat[c], PixelToLong[a]}, {PixelToLat[d], 
         PixelToLong[b]}, opts];
      property = 
       Graphics[{RGBColor[1, 1, 1, .3], 
         Polygon /@ Map[{0, 40000} + {1, -1} # &, poly, {2}]}, 
        PlotRange -> {{a, b}, 40000 - {d, c}}, opts];
      loss = ForestLoss[{PixelToLat[c], PixelToLong[a]}, {PixelToLat[d], 
         PixelToLong[b]}, yrs, opts];
      ImageCompose[ImageCompose[sat, property], loss]
      ]

The command LossCount[poly, yrs] counts the number of pixels of forest loss within the property represented by the polygons poly (as output by ImportPolygons), during the years yrs. Note that yrs is expected to be a set of years from 2001 to 2018, inclusive.

    LossCount[poly_, yrs_] :=

     Module[{maxlat, maxlong, minlat, minlong, lat, long, r},
      {long, lat} = Transpose[Flatten[poly, 1]];
      maxlong = Max[long];
      minlong = Min[long];
      maxlat = Max[lat];
      minlat = Min[lat];
      r = DiscretizeRegion[RegionUnion @@ (Region[Polygon[#]] & /@ poly)];
      Count[Cases[
        Flatten[MapIndexed[{#1, Reverse[#2] + {minlong, minlat} - {1, 1}} &, 
          ImageData[ImageTake[lossW80, {minlat, maxlat}, {minlong, maxlong}], 
           "Byte"], {2}], 1], {y_ /; MemberQ[yrs, y + 2000], p_} -> p], 
       p_ /; RegionMember[r, p]]
      ]

EXAMPLE: a real case in the Southern Peruvian amazon; for the sake of the exercise we are not differentiating or calibrating the natural and human-made deforestation.


Registry

First, we define the area of interest by calling a satellite image.

        satexample = 
         SatImage[{-12.6895, -73.8055}, {-12.6895 - 1/40, -73.8055 + 1/40}]

enter image description here

Second, we check the amount of forest loss for a specific year or a period of time.

        lossexample = 
         ForestLoss[{-12.6895, -73.8055}, {-12.6895 - 1/40, -73.8055 + 
            1/40}, {2018}]

enter image description here

Third, for a rapid visual contrast, we could simply overlap the two previous results.

    ImageCompose[satexample, lossexample]

enter image description here

Consider the following property:

    Import[dir <> "CN  SHIPETIARI/Shipetiari.shp"]

enter image description here

First, we import the polygons using ImportPolygons. Note that the ImageSize option can be used to specify the size of the image.

    poly = ImportPolygons[dir <> "CN  SHIPETIARI/Shipetiari.shp"];
    PropertyImage[poly, Range[2001, 2018], 20, ImageSize -> 600]

enter image description here

Then we can immediately calculate the number of pixels per year and from there the area of forest loss.

    In[32]:= LossCount[poly, Range[2001, 2018]]

    Out[32]= 1508

    In[33]:= LossCount[poly, {2015}]

    Out[33]= 25

    In[34]:= LossCount[poly, {2018}]

    Out[34]= 124

    In[35]:= data = Table[LossCount[poly, {y}], {y, 2001, 2018}]

    Out[35]= {131, 70, 73, 73, 37, 16, 97, 70, 34, 230, 41, 79, 69, 92, 25, 67, 180, 124}

    BarChart[data, ChartLabels -> Range[1, 18]]

enter image description here

    In[35]:= Export[dir <> "testfile.csv", {data, Range[2001, 2018]}]

    Out[35]= "~/Documents/WSS2019/WSS2019-FinalProject/testfile.csv"

Contract

  • Coding the contract: Assume that the contract began in 2010, and is evaluated once a year. Ideally, the string URL should be a URL to the property's online polygon data in the official Peruvian registry. For this demonstration, a locally-stored file is used, instead. Then, an example of a possible contract would be the following.

    Block[{begin=2010,poly,url=dir<>"CN  SHIPETIARI/Shipetiari.shp"},
    poly=ImportPolygons[url];If[LossCount[poly,Range[2001,2010]]/(2010-2001+1)>LossCount[poly,{First[DateList[]]-1}],BlockchainPut["Pay"],BlockchainPut["Don't pay"]]]
    
  • Writing the contract: For this example, we are considering the average deforestation from the previous ten years to the beginning of the contract. The forest loss detected should be lower than that number in order to comply with the contract and get the payment.

    In[22]:= contractTXId = 
     BlockchainPut[
      Hold[Block[{begin = 2010, poly, 
         url = dir <> "CN  SHIPETIARI/Shipetiari.shp"},
        poly = ImportPolygons[url]; 
        If[LossCount[poly, Range[2001, 2010]]/(2010 - 2001 + 1) > 
          LossCount[poly, {First[DateList[]] - 1}], BlockchainPut["Pay"], 
         BlockchainPut["Don't pay"]]]]]
    
    Out[22]= "a3a3475e55915b894c17175ebea63efcc9561b14eded9ab7710d6cc07d988064"
    

Note that the average loss between 2001 and 2010 was around 83 pixels.

    In[27]:= N[LossCount[poly, Range[2001, 2010]]/(2010 - 2001 + 1)]

    Out[27]= 83.1

The loss last year (2018), was 124 pixels.

    In[30]:= LossCount[poly, {First[DateList[]] - 1}]

    Out[30]= 124
  • Executing the contract: Once a year, we evaluate the contract:

    In[23]:= resultTXId = ReleaseHold[BlockchainGet[contractTXId]]
    
    Out[23]= "e1fce4b7236463f3895473e5608dc9273296b4bd44c9daf85a6b2fe1985878db"
    

Payment: the process generates knowledge to make a decision.

    In[24]:= BlockchainGet[resultTXId]

    Out[24]= "Don't pay"

PRODUCT: Funding Platform


Funding platform for climate change or sustainability projects, by connecting planetary stewards and securing transactions between them.

There will be two types of participants, the ones who do the payments and the ones who get paid, similar to Kickstarter or Patreon. Each area or landscape will have its own fund following a specific set of rules for the redistribution of the money within its inhabitants (participants). The innovative idea has to do with a system of "points" for the engagement of individuals, as a complement of the economic transactions between organizations like companies and communities. Using the smartphones we can directly reach millions of individuals influencing their behavior towards a more sustainable lifestyle.

FUTURE WORK


Design, develop, and test a commercial prototype of a funding platform for planetary stewardship, if successful, a company will be created.

Incorporate machine learning, convolutional neural networks, and satellite imagery with better temporal and spatial resolution, then connect these results with a blockchain through a classifier.

Automate the detection not only of deforestation but also of land-use change (what happens afterward).

Development of a dynamic Forest Index, as a practical proxy for ecosystem's health.

Analyze the connections with UBI (Universal Basic Income) and poverty reduction in rural areas.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT


Thanks to Stephen Wolfram, Matthew Szudzik, and Christian Pasquel for their suggestions and help with the code.

POSTED BY: David Torres
5 Replies

I think there are TWO spaces in the name of that file, between the words CN and SHIPETIARI... My mistake. See attached.

There are more polygons available (Shipetiari included) on websites like this one: LandMark

Thanks.

POSTED BY: David Torres

hi, I try syntax. but I can't find "CN SHIPETIARI/Shipetiari.shp". could you please help me? Thanks

POSTED BY: Danial -

enter image description here - Congratulations! This post is now featured in our Staff Pick column as distinguished by a badge on your profile of a Featured Contributor! Thank you, keep it coming, and consider contributing your work to the The Notebook Archive!

POSTED BY: EDITORIAL BOARD

Hi Leanne.

Thanks for your comment. Those are good points.

Governments definitely have to play a key role, from generating and publishing the official forest change domestic data to administrate the national REDD+ registry (is also the responsible for international issues like reporting to UNFCCC, SDGs, etc.). This main registry will have to deal with multiple actors and different aspects, not only payments but also property rights, etc.

However, oftentimes governments are slow and not too flexible. Whereas companies or the market can be more agile and experimental, and that's the spirit of the suggestion about the use of blockchain; in other words, as a competitive advantage of my private initiative in relation to others. Having our own automated registry of the transactions been supported not only makes our operation more efficient but also a better partner for the government, because we can track all the transactions at any time and connect them to the specific place or area that is supporting.

The idea is to be a complement of the government's programs, by increasing the participation of organizations and individuals through innovation. How to do this? that's more about the user interface and strategy than about blockchain. Initially, the engagement was at the domestic level but it could go internationally with a good digital tool, allowing the participation of normal organizations/individuals, not just wealthy groups.

Ideally, in this particular issue of forest stewardship, we should work towards a "+" instead of a "vs" with the government. Of course, public money and private money has to be treated separately, but they can effectively be used for the same goal.

Best

David
PS: technically, this is not a tax ("carbon tax"). It's a voluntary recognition or support of the work done at the field level. But yes, a tax may come sooner or later, and we will have to adapt.

POSTED BY: David Torres

Hi David, this is cool. Can you explain why you chose a blockchain distributed database as opposed to an open government-run centralized database. Is it because the government won't and therefore you need a bottom up civil society solution? Or perhaps the government says that it will, but it is not a trustworthy actor.

How would you get everyone in the region to participate, especially those who will pay the tax. Is it dependent on a local political movement or wealthy environmentalists in other countries to get involved. I presume international parties can lock themselves into a payment plan through a blockchain easier than creating an international government/treaty redistribution plan.

Perhaps future work can compare the benefits of the blockchain vs centralized / government solutions. e.g. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3268282/

POSTED BY: leanne ussher
Reply to this discussion
Community posts can be styled and formatted using the Markdown syntax.
Reply Preview
Attachments
Remove
or Discard

Group Abstract Group Abstract