Group Abstract Group Abstract

Message Boards Message Boards

The role of irrational numbers in the Wolfram model

Consider a string rewriting system, that we will call the Baire rewriting system, where the alphabet is the set of positive integers (characters) and assume all possible rules of the form: w is substituted by w<>n, for any word w and any character n, where "<>" is the symbol for concatenation. In the framework of the Wolfram Model, the worldlines in the Baire rewriting system are the sequences of words w(1), w(2), w(3),... such that w(i+1) is obtained from w(i) by applying a rule for each i. By interpreting each word as a finite continued fraction, the set of world lines is in one-to-one correspondence with the infinite continued fractions in positive integers, i.e., the irrational numbers largest than 1. From a topological point of view, it is natural to consider the limiting manifold of the Baire rewriting system as the topological space obtained by restricting the topology of the real line to the irrational number larger than 1. This topological space is known as the Baire space (do not confuse this concept with a Baire space).

At first glance, this example of limiting manifold of a causal graph may seem too general to be interesting in practice. Nevertheless, any Polish space is the continuous image of the Baire space. Hence, given a string rewriting system (over a finite alphabet), whose causal graph converges to a limiting manifold that is a Polish space, is just a "continuous image" of the Baire rewriting system, e.g., some different worldlines in the Baire rewriting system may collapse to a single worldline in a given string rewriting system.

Now, the challenge is to provide non-trivial examples of the application of this framework to prove the convergence of a causal graph to a limiting manifold that is a Polish space.

9 Replies
Posted 5 years ago

Everything here is based off of 2/3 or 3/2 or 4/3

Attachment

Attachment

POSTED BY: David Petry
Posted 5 years ago

enter image description here

POSTED BY: David Petry
Posted 5 years ago

I’m going to research your point of view...

From my observation, I’m simply using an upbeat and a downbeat, while realizing the dimension I’m currently living within, creating music does not allow “3” because there is only a downbeat and an upbeat. I can create 3 but I’m actually using 6 when playing 3. I can explain more on this later.

David Petry

POSTED BY: David Petry

Does this help? I’m creating a frequency of 11 from 8. The foundation is based on a wave down and up. Using 2’s and 3’s (6) The rule is 2 becomes 3, 3 becomes 2, 4 becomes 3, 3 becomes 4

Yes -if I well understood- basically you are working with a string rewriting system motivated by applications in theoretical music. Maybe there is a function such that when it is applied to any vertex of the Baire string rewriting system (topological space of irrational numbers), the result is your string rewriting system. In order to explore deeper this idea, it is important to see the code of your method expressed as a string rewriting system. Here are some functions that may be useful.

Posted 5 years ago

Does this help? I’m creating a frequency of 11 from 8. The foundation is based on a wave down and up. Using 2’s and 3’s (6)
The rule is 2 becomes 3, 3 becomes 2, 4 becomes 3, 3 becomes 4

Thinking harmonically or vertical. 3/3/2 becomes 4/4/3 =8/11 Below is a video link of me performing it. It sounds completely natural, I’m quantizing it or allowing the gravity to pull me to count 1. The gravity will also occur throughout the space and time

I’ve also included 9/13 in the attachments

David Petry https://www.instagram.com/tv/CBupS2HFlRJ/?igshid=i0emsd0ah3po

Attachment

Attachment

POSTED BY: David Petry
POSTED BY: Pavlo Bulanchuk
POSTED BY: Pavlo Bulanchuk
Reply to this discussion
Community posts can be styled and formatted using the Markdown syntax.
Reply Preview
Attachments
Remove
or Discard