"I gather the WQF supports traditional QM formatting for output, should one wish to do that. Is your issue that there is not support for bra-let and related infix such as tensor product for inputs?"

Daniel , thats all I am asking , WQF supports traditional QM formatting for output and I want support for is bra-let and related infix such as tensor product for inputs. This would give WQF much more power . For the non expert they can use WQF as it is but for those that want to use the full extent of the bra-let for input it would make WQF much more powerful . WQF would encompass the Quantum AddOnn.

So I can assume you will claim that the adherence to quantum notation (dirac notation ) for inputs and outputs in the Quantum AddOn is just frivolous and that "notations are a minor thing in design, and nothing fundamental at all, only a simple formatting in the input/output" . ( have you even looked at Quantum AddOn, is all that notation just for Quantum experts?

"Notations you like, are, of course, readable for quantum experts only". If you read any books on Quantum Computing or Quantum information, then dirac notation is fundamental to the presentation (see Ike and Mike ) . To say that " Notations is for quantum experts only" is just simply wrong (to quote you . ) . You do you think the principle users of the Quantum Framework are going to be, none expert or aspiring quantum experts.

So why dont you test your "anti notation " stance when the Quantum Framework Course is presented in a few weeks by WolframU . At the beginning of each course we are normally presented with multiple choice Questions about the course ansdour experience with the course material .

Why dont you ask a question like :

And I am sure I will be the only one to answer B So you can follow up with

Python/Qiskit cannot do Quantum computing/dirac notation .Simple. The Quantum AddOn can do Quantum computing /dirac notation very effectively. The new Wolfram Quantum Framework developers obviously made a conscious decision not to go with notation but implement qiskit in Mathematica. Wolfram Quantum Framework gives me no advantage ( in terms of notation ) over qiskit so I will not invest my time in Wolfram Quantum Framework and just stick to Qiskit and the Quantum AddOn ,

I am told I will not be able to implement the Quantum Switch or construct a controlled-gate with many control and many target. But I have the Quantum AddOn which allows me to construct gates in dirac notation so I will give the Wolfram Quantum Framework a miss.