Group Abstract Group Abstract

Message Boards Message Boards

2
|
2.9K Views
|
5 Replies
|
2 Total Likes
View groups...
Share
Share this post:

Mathematica vs 2022 MIT Integration Bee Qualifying Exam

POSTED BY: Peter Burbery
5 Replies

I would like to share how I got the correct answer to #3 on the 2022 qualifying exam. I set $MaxPiecewiseCases to 10000 and then

\!\(
\*SubsuperscriptBox[\(\[Integral]\), \(0\), \(2022\)]\(\((
\*SuperscriptBox[\(x\), \(2\)] - \[LeftFloor]x\[RightFloor] \
\[LeftCeiling]x\[RightCeiling])\) \[DifferentialD]x\)\)

worked to output 674. Edit: I didn't realize I already solved this in my first post.

POSTED BY: Peter Burbery

I started working through the regular season problems.

POSTED BY: Peter Burbery

Stephen Wolfram writes about the advances Mathematica has made in his blog post "Don't Forget Integrals!" for 13.0. I think its exciting to be able to simplify an integral that was previously expressible only in terms of elliptic integrals into ArcTanh, for example.

POSTED BY: Peter Burbery

For example the function IntegrateAlgebraic uses many different heuristics to try to find the best form of a integral, but its a very challenging problem. I might have been able to resolve some of the challenging problems with IntegrateAlgebraic, which uses Laurent Series for example to compute the simplest expansion in terms of elementary functions.

POSTED BY: Peter Burbery

I would like to mention that there is a lot of theory behind finding the simplest form of an integral.

POSTED BY: Peter Burbery
Reply to this discussion
Community posts can be styled and formatted using the Markdown syntax.
Reply Preview
Attachments
Remove
or Discard