Message Boards

GROUPS:

Data Science Mathematics Mathematica Presentation and Notebooks

Undocumented truncation of reals in displaying datasets

Michael Helmle

Posted 8 years ago

4976 Views

3 Replies

0 Total Likes

Follow this post

Accidently I stepped into the following feature: if you have real number in a dataset which are in the range 100000. or above the default displaying mode of the dataset seems to truncate the real numbers after 4 digits. In fact it is much easier to understand the issue by looking at a simple example: randomData = RandomInteger[{490000, 500000}, 5]; data6 = Map[{#, N[#]} &, randomData]; data100 = Dataset[Map[Association[Thread[{"Int", "Real"} -> #]] &, data6]] Executing these lines results in a view similar like the following: Out[1]: display of Dataset Obviously the integers in column 1 are displayed without truncation, but the corresponding reals are displayed truncated afetr 4 digits. I would not call this a bug, but rather an unexpected and undocumented feature. To be clear: the numbers in the dataset are not truncated which can be proofed by running Normal[Dataset]

POSTED BY: Michael Helmle

3 Replies

Sort By:

Posted 8 years ago

Hello Jesse, what I am trying to say is this (I am not a native English speaker, so excuse me if my description was not precise): if you look at column 1 and compare it to column 2 you see a different number -> 491612 vs. 491600. This is what I refered too as being "truncated". I am not aware that there is anywhere in the documentation a hint regarding the representation of Reals and that, although they are displayed with 6 digits left of the decinal point, they are in fact rounded to 4 vaild digits

POSTED BY: Michael Helmle

Posted 8 years ago

I see what you mean. That is indeed odd. (The correct terminology is rounding, but I probably should have paid closer attention to the output anyways.) A Trace of the Dataset doesn't show any rounding going on, but I did notice that if you copy and paste the Dataset object, the Reals are represented as strings: I think this issue may have something to do with the machine-number precision of the reals Dataset displays.