Group Abstract Group Abstract

Message Boards Message Boards

0
|
4.7K Views
|
6 Replies
|
2 Total Likes
View groups...
Share
Share this post:

Is there a work-around to use Solve with Quaternions?

Posted 10 years ago

I just noticed in the documentation that one can't use "dom = Quaternions" as the last parameter of Solve. Is there a work-around? Developmental plans?

POSTED BY: lester welch
6 Replies
Posted 10 years ago

Right - so why doesn't MMA do that with "Solve?" and allow "dom=Quaternion?" Or maybe Solve doesn't solve matrix equations either? Haven't checked.

POSTED BY: lester welch

You can simulate quaternions with a linear combination of the 3 Pauli spin matrices and the 2x2 identity matrix.

POSTED BY: S M Blinder
Posted 10 years ago

Hmmm, - matrice representations .....that may be the "work-around." Thanks.

POSTED BY: lester welch

Noncommutativity would be an issue, yes. Might be possible to embed in matrix algebra though.

POSTED BY: Daniel Lichtblau
Posted 10 years ago

Thanks. I'm curious though. One can certainly have polynomials of quaternions just like one can for complexes. Is it the non-commuting nature that is the problem?

POSTED BY: lester welch
POSTED BY: Daniel Lichtblau
Reply to this discussion
Community posts can be styled and formatted using the Markdown syntax.
Reply Preview
Attachments
Remove
or Discard