User Portlet
Featured Contributor
| Discussions |
|---|
| @duanek - you can access Wolfram|Alpha from Mathematica with something like the following, ``` WolframAlpha["UNS S31600 resistivity"] ``` There you should find everything you find on the website. In particular the "Result" pod contains the data... |
| Hi, any updates in this in this post? I'm having the same issue. |
| Works well, thank you! |
| Do the answers to [RegionPlot with LogScale](https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/a/113565/9490) help you? |
| 1. Jason, Thank you so much for your valuable feedback. 2. I have to admit, that some of my assumptions were wrong and misleading. I am sorry. 3. I could not correctly distinguish between the name of an edge and the position of a vertex in a... |
| ![enter image description here][2] -- you have earned ***Featured Contributor Badge*** ![enter image description here][1] Your exceptional post has been selected for our editorial column ***Staff Picks*** http://wolfr.am/StaffPicks and [Your... |
| Rohit, Thank you for your suggestion, but the use of Symbolize[] from Notation package seems irrelevant here, as it would turn the subscripted function into an atomic symbol, but the task at hand requires the actual dependency on the subscript... |
| It performs exactly as I would expect. In some cases the `test` you wish to run is very fast, so that it is faster to run that test on all the inputs and check the results after than it is to do the incremental checks needed for the short circuit. ... |
| Great! It gets nicer and nicer. |
| When you said function in your original post, I misinterpreted what you meant: The two expressions funcPattern[x_] := x^2 + 1 and function = Function[{x}, x^2 + 1] have the same behavior to the user, but they are different... |