User Portlet
| Discussions |
|---|
| Well i am not convinced yet. As there are many unclear things. Can you write a program (better a replacement rule based) which generates such a graph as you are thinking? Could you also proof algebraically that a left and up movement results in a... |
| Yes. This forum is cursed. I had threads vanish ... just to reclaim them later. Maybe it becomes necessary to look into alternative places. |
| Heureka. The solution was discovered thanks to Malthe Andersen who had an inspired solution in this thread: https://community.wolfram.com/groups/-/m/t/1946413 ![enter image description here][1] However you still got the problem of long tails.... |
| > The ratios such as 1:3 indicate how Two girds are connected to each other such as A and B. Since arcsin(1/3) is irrational w.r.t pi you could just keep on using 1:3 to connect grid C to B and so on to keep the rotation going. Ahh, i thought you... |
| > I am sorry for the unclarity. Actually, I just wanted to find a way to > package a sub-network as a node and see what properties will the new > net have. So you are having problems finding tooling to reshape graphs? The tooling of WFPP is... |
| If it wasn't obvious, they way you construct the Hyper Graph can impact performance and potentially the result to. Timing[WolframModel[{{1,2,1}, {5, 6}, {5}} -> { {1,11},{2,12}, ... |
| It is not obvious to me how you would connect grids like that. (So far i failed to construct grids but that's a different problem). You have nothing in which you can measure an angle, so you can't identify which nodes of different grids should be... |
| > Which would raise the question of what a graph for a given rule would have to look like in order to lead to a split. And then again, how large that split would be. Possibly, only certain structures can be split off? Maybe, it has something to do... |