User Portlet
| Discussions |
|---|
| Problem solved. Within the option *PlotMarkers*, the value of *Thickness* within *Edgeform* was set too small, thus somehow the plotmarkers disappeared in the pdf. I increased that by a factor of 100 and now it works. |
| Hi Neil. The second one is a nice solution, thank you. Still having problems with the pdf export. Wasn't there in my previous Mathematica version. Best, Markus |
| Great idea, thank you again. Just as a side note: The solution shown in your plot is asymmetric along the x-axis, which is strange since it is there is nothing physical enforcing this. I shifted everything by lambda/2 in x-direction, and now it... |
| Hi Tim. Thank you very much for the idea of warping the solution into a loop and change MinPoints (and your code). I did that by placing the code into TimeConstrained (to terminate the calculation after a predefined time) and by checking if there... |
| John, I did not complain about Mathematica, read my text carefully. I only want to know if Mathematica can do what I requested. Code was already attached (see initial question). Maybe you have a solution than the "old trick", which was a nice... |
| That is exactly what I was looking for. Thanks. |
| Works nicely. Thanks. |
| I have tried all the things being suggested, and in the end I create a new 2D matrix (i.e., table) that contains the result of NDsolve at discrete points using the interpolation function (goes along the lines of Neil's suggestion). This is saved and... |
| I want to do a Fourier transformation of an interpolation function that is the result of NDsolve along one variable. Currently I am using the following approach, which numerically integrates the kernel ... |
| Sorry, didn't mention this. *m* is always an integer. |