User Portlet
Discussions |
---|
Thanks Jesse, this is exactly what I needed |
Thanks Ben for starting this post and the others for their replies. I had the exact same question, and this helped. One "wrinkle" I would like to add is this: in one of the Mathematica online video workshops [Write Faster Code with Wolfram Language ... |
Hi WCC, I'm afraid the physics content of my model doesn't go that deep. I wanted to show to a 1st year EM class how ferromegnetism differs qualitatively from paramagnetism. My first thought was to just have fixed domains and then vary their... |
Update, fixed typos. Sorry about that (learning to type with a splint on my hand for :) ). Thx to selahittin for the fix. Hi I have a question about stacking multiple graphics into a given object. I have typically been using [code]Show[{... |
Thanks Frank, However, setting EvaluateSymbolically to either True or False does not change the behavior. I have been able to use these function so far (within Show) by wrapping them in Quiet. |
Thank you all, this was very helpful. The Plus@@@Tuples was the approach that I had originally wanted to translate from "gray-matter" language into mathematica language. Didn't realize the correspondence was quite so literal :) |
(updated with formatting fix) Hi all, I am attempting to follow along a (very nice) example I got from http://blog.wolfram.com/2012/07/20/on-the-importance-of-being-edgy-electrostatic-and-magnetostatic-problems-with-sharp-edges/ I am having a... |
Thank you both. That was helpful. |
Thanks, Greatly appreciated. |