User Portlet User Portlet

Discussions
Thanks Jesse, this is exactly what I needed
Thanks Ben for starting this post and the others for their replies. I had the exact same question, and this helped. One "wrinkle" I would like to add is this: in one of the Mathematica online video workshops [Write Faster Code with Wolfram Language ...
Hi WCC,  I'm afraid the physics content of my model doesn't go that deep. I wanted to show to a 1st year EM class how ferromegnetism differs qualitatively from paramagnetism. My first thought was to just have fixed domains and then vary their...
Update, fixed typos. Sorry about that (learning to type with a splint on my hand for :) ). Thx to selahittin for the fix. Hi I have a question about stacking multiple graphics into a given object. I have typically been using  [code]Show[{...
Thanks Frank, However, setting EvaluateSymbolically to either True or False does not change the behavior. I have been able to use these function so far (within Show) by wrapping them in Quiet.
Thank you all, this was very helpful.   The Plus@@@Tuples was the approach that I had originally wanted to translate from "gray-matter" language into mathematica language. Didn't realize the correspondence was quite so literal :)
(updated with formatting fix) Hi all,  I am attempting to follow along a (very nice) example I got from http://blog.wolfram.com/2012/07/20/on-the-importance-of-being-edgy-electrostatic-and-magnetostatic-problems-with-sharp-edges/ I am having a...
Thank you both. That was helpful.
Thanks, Greatly appreciated.