1
|
16282 Views
|
8 Replies
|
13 Total Likes
View groups...
Share
GROUPS:

# Bug at Wolfram|Alpha (Solve the indefinite integral, steps not available)

Posted 11 years ago
8 Replies
Sort By:
Posted 11 years ago
 @VitaliyI'll look into getting this fixed for you. In the mean time, you can see the steps by writing your integral as int x^2/((1-x^2)^(3/2)) dx, rather than int x^2/((1-x^2)^3)^(1/2) dxhttp://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=int+x%5E2%2F%28%281-x%5E2%29%5E%283%2F2%29%29+dxThe problem is (z^3)^(1/2) is not always equal to z^(3/2). To see a step-by-step solution why, check out http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=%28%28-1%29%5E3%29%5E%281%2F2%29+vs.+%28%28-1%29%5E%283%2F2%29%29.However, if we assume z >= 0, then (z^3)^(1/2) = z^(3/2).
Posted 11 years ago
 Lack of a feature is not a bug.
Posted 11 years ago
 I was able to get both Mathematica 7.0.1 and Wolfram Alpha to give the hand-calculated answer by introducing an assumption that 0 < x < 1. My instruction for both was Simplify[Integrate[ x^2/Sqrt[(1 - x^2)^3], x], 0 < x < 1]
Posted 11 years ago
 Why do you call it a bug?
Posted 11 years ago
 The bug... I mean the "step-by-step" solution is unavailable. It's a bug, because if the task solved, the system did some steps to solve it.About form... Of course it's not the bug. Thanks, Bill Simpson. He wrote very good answer for me, I appreciate it.
Posted 11 years ago
 I remember a review, probably in the late '80s or very early '90s, maybe in American Math Monthly, where there was a sentence to the effect that putting Microsoft Windows and Mathematica together was trying to get the world's two least cooperative programs to play well together. Unfortunately I can't get an online article archive that goes back that far and I can't find the right words to help Google find it for me. The original sentence was much better than my fumbling attempt at recall. If anyone can find a reference to that sentence I'd love to see it again.Every team has a culture and that has effects far beyond what you can imagine, so choose yours carefully.
Posted 11 years ago
 In the early days of Mathematica, we preferred the term "unexpected behaviour." This leaves the door open.   ;-)
Posted 11 years ago
 It is possible that the powerful, and thus extremely complicated, methods that Mathematica uses to solve some problems do not really have any simple easily understood steps that would be what a human would use to solve the problem.To gain some confidence in the answer you might differentiate and simplify and see if you get the original back.http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=Simplify%5BD%5B-%28x%5E2+-+1%29+%28x+-+Sqrt%5B1+-+x%5E2%5D+ArcSin%5Bx%5D%29%2F+++++Sqrt%5B-%28x%5E2+-+1%29%5E3%5D%2C+x%5D%5DThat gives me a little more confidence that it might be correct.If you are looking for your simpler form then I am guessing that you are assuming that -1