Message Boards

WOLFRAM COMMUNITY

5115 Views

5 Replies

3 Total Likes

View groups...

Follow this post

Share this post:

GROUPS:

Non-linear data fitting: Overflow occurred in computation?

Jung Hwan Kim

Jung Hwan Kim, Penn State Univ.

Posted 2 years ago

I have an imported data set data1 = {{1.`^-16, 0.`}, {7.746`, 0.1129`}, {13.4164`, 0.1554`}, {17.3205`, 0.1891`}, {20.4939`, 0.2139`}, {24.4949`, 0.2587`}, {30.`, 0.3351`}, {34.641`, 0.4076`}, {38.7298`, 0.4437`}, {42.4264`, 0.4992`}, {51.9615`, 0.646`}, {60.`, 0.7401`}, {67.082`, 0.8343`}, {73.4847`, 0.9055`}, {79.3725`, 0.9594`}, {84.8528`, 0.9615`}, {90.`, 0.9541`}, {94.8683`, 0.9723`}, {99.4987`, 0.9951`}, {103.923`, 0.9901`}, {108.1665`, 0.989`}, {112.2497`, 1.`}, {116.1895`, 0.9898`}, {120.`, 0.9876`}}; Which I'd like to fit to an equation. (in the screenshot) It seems that I've done something wrong along the way, but I can't seem to find it. The fitting parameter that Mathematica has given me is negative, which is obviously ridiculous. Attachments:* Untitled-1.nb

I have an imported data set

data1 = {{1.`*^-16, 0.`}, {7.746`, 0.1129`}, {13.4164`, 
    0.1554`}, {17.3205`, 0.1891`}, {20.4939`, 0.2139`}, {24.4949`, 
    0.2587`}, {30.`, 0.3351`}, {34.641`, 0.4076`}, {38.7298`, 
    0.4437`}, {42.4264`, 0.4992`}, {51.9615`, 0.646`}, {60.`, 
    0.7401`}, {67.082`, 0.8343`}, {73.4847`, 0.9055`}, {79.3725`, 
    0.9594`}, {84.8528`, 0.9615`}, {90.`, 0.9541`}, {94.8683`, 
    0.9723`}, {99.4987`, 0.9951`}, {103.923`, 0.9901`}, {108.1665`, 
    0.989`}, {112.2497`, 1.`}, {116.1895`, 0.9898`}, {120.`, 
    0.9876`}};

Which I'd like to fit to an equation. (in the screenshot) enter image description here

It seems that I've done something wrong along the way, but I can't seem to find it. The fitting parameter that Mathematica has given me is negative, which is obviously ridiculous.

POSTED BY: Jung Hwan Kim

5 Replies

Sort By:

Jim Baldwin

Posted 2 years ago

Neil Singer gave you good advice in checking out the fit. It just turned out that an even smaller value of `diffusion` is needed. nMax = 5; L = 0.05484; nlm = NonlinearModelFit[data1, 2 Sqrt[diffusion]x(1/L)(Pi^(-0.5) + 2Sum[((-1)^n)Erfc[(nL)/(Sqrt[diffusion]x)], {n, 1, nMax}]), {{diffusion, 0.0000002}}, x]; nlm["BestFitParameters"] ( {diffusion -> 1.7240910^-7} ) Show[ListPlot[data1], Plot[nlm[x], {x, Min[data1[[All, 1]]], Max[data1[[All, 1]]]}]] Not a great fit. (And using `nMax = 5` or `nMax = 100` changes almost nothing.) But I wonder if there's simply a missing multiplier. Here's a fit adding in a multiplicative parameter: nMax = 5; L = 0.05484; nlm = NonlinearModelFit[data1, 2 a Sqrt[diffusion]x(1/L)(Pi^(-0.5) + 2Sum[((-1)^n)Erfc[(nL)/(Sqrt[diffusion]x)], {n, 1, nMax}]), {{diffusion, 0.0000002}, {a, 1}}, x]; nlm["BestFitParameters"] ( {diffusion -> 1.5130310^-7, a -> 1.51} ) Show[ListPlot[data1], Plot[nlm[x], {x, Min[data1[[All, 1]]], Max[data1[[All, 1]]]}]]

Neil Singer gave you good advice in checking out the fit. It just turned out that an even smaller value of diffusion is needed.

nMax = 5;
L = 0.05484; 
nlm = NonlinearModelFit[data1, 2 Sqrt[diffusion]*x*(1/L)*(Pi^(-0.5) +
     2*Sum[((-1)^n)*Erfc[(n*L)/(Sqrt[diffusion]*x)], {n, 1, nMax}]),
  {{diffusion, 0.0000002}}, x];
nlm["BestFitParameters"]
(* {diffusion -> 1.72409*10^-7} *)

Show[ListPlot[data1], Plot[nlm[x], {x, Min[data1[[All, 1]]], Max[data1[[All, 1]]]}]]

Data and fit

Not a great fit. (And using nMax = 5 or nMax = 100 changes almost nothing.) But I wonder if there's simply a missing multiplier. Here's a fit adding in a multiplicative parameter:

nMax = 5;
L = 0.05484; 

nlm = NonlinearModelFit[data1, 2 a Sqrt[diffusion]*x*(1/L)*(Pi^(-0.5) +
     2*Sum[((-1)^n)*Erfc[(n*L)/(Sqrt[diffusion]*x)], {n, 1, nMax}]),
  {{diffusion, 0.0000002}, {a, 1}}, x];
nlm["BestFitParameters"]
(* {diffusion -> 1.51303*10^-7, a -> 1.51} *)

Show[ListPlot[data1], Plot[nlm[x], {x, Min[data1[[All, 1]]], Max[data1[[All, 1]]]}]]

Data and better fit

POSTED BY: Jim Baldwin

Neil Singer

Neil Singer, AC Kinetics, Inc.

Posted 2 years ago

Your fitting function is a horrible fit to your data. You must have something wrong. To visualize this do the following: Manipulate[ Show[ListLinePlot[data1, PlotStyle -> Orange], Plot[2Sqrt[diffusion]x(1/L)(Pi^(-0.5) + 2(\!\( \UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(n = 1\), \(100\)]\(\((\((\(-1\))\)^n)\)* Erfc[\((nL)\)/\((Sqrt[diffusion]x)\)]\)\))), {x, 0, 120}], PlotRange -> All], {diffusion, 0.0001, 1}] You can sweep through values of diffusion and see it is a horrible fit. To get a "Best Fit" (which is equally horrible!) you need to constrain the value of diffusion to positive values to avoid imaginary numbers: In[4]:= dataFitting = FindFit[data1, {2Sqrt[diffusion]x(1/L)(Pi^(-0.5) + 2(\!\( \UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(n = 1\), \(100\)]\(\((\((\(-1\))\)^n)\)* Erfc[\((nL)\)/\((Sqrt[diffusion]x)\)]\)\))), diffusion > 0.0}, {diffusion}, x] Out[4]= {diffusion -> 0.00911926} Which gives you the "Best Fit" of: function = 2Sqrt[diffusion]x(1/L)(Pi^(-0.5) + 2(\!\( \UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(n = 1\), \(100\)]\(\((\((\(-1\))\)^n)\)* Erfc[\((nL)\)/\((Sqrt[diffusion]x)\)]\)\))) /. dataFitting; Show[ListLinePlot[data1, PlotStyle -> Orange], Plot[function, {x, 0, 120}], PlotRange -> All] Which is not very good but "As good as you can get" with that function as your fitting function. Regards, Neil

Your fitting function is a horrible fit to your data. You must have something wrong. To visualize this do the following:

Manipulate[
 Show[ListLinePlot[data1, PlotStyle -> Orange], 
  Plot[2*Sqrt[diffusion]*x*(1/L)*(Pi^(-0.5) + 2*(\!\(
\*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(n = 
           1\), \(100\)]\(\((\((\(-1\))\)^n)\)*
          Erfc[\((n*L)\)/\((Sqrt[diffusion]*x)\)]\)\))), {x, 0, 120}],
   PlotRange -> All], {diffusion, 0.0001, 1}]

You can sweep through values of diffusion and see it is a horrible fit. To get a "Best Fit" (which is equally horrible!) you need to constrain the value of diffusion to positive values to avoid imaginary numbers:

In[4]:= dataFitting = 
 FindFit[data1, {2*Sqrt[diffusion]*x*(1/L)*(Pi^(-0.5) + 2*(\!\(
\*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(n = 
           1\), \(100\)]\(\((\((\(-1\))\)^n)\)*
          Erfc[\((n*L)\)/\((Sqrt[diffusion]*x)\)]\)\))), 
   diffusion > 0.0}, {diffusion}, x]

Out[4]= {diffusion -> 0.00911926}

Which gives you the "Best Fit" of:

function = 2*Sqrt[diffusion]*x*(1/L)*(Pi^(-0.5) + 2*(\!\(
\*UnderoverscriptBox[\(\[Sum]\), \(n = 
          1\), \(100\)]\(\((\((\(-1\))\)^n)\)*
         Erfc[\((n*L)\)/\((Sqrt[diffusion]*x)\)]\)\))) /. 
  dataFitting; 
Show[ListLinePlot[data1, PlotStyle -> Orange], Plot[function, {x, 0, 120}], 
     PlotRange -> All]

enter image description here

Which is not very good but "As good as you can get" with that function as your fitting function.

Regards,

Neil

POSTED BY: Neil Singer

Ehud Behar

Posted 2 years ago

Your first number is `{1.*^-16, 0.}` which is essentially two zeros. Maybe try to change it `{0, 0}`?

POSTED BY: Ehud Behar

Jung Hwan Kim

Jung Hwan Kim, Penn State Univ.

Posted 2 years ago

Well, I've tried that, but I now have a new set of errors.

POSTED BY: Jung Hwan Kim

Jung Hwan Kim

Jung Hwan Kim, Penn State Univ.

Posted 2 years ago

Thank you for this enlightenment. I'll try to work things out with my function. Although I haven't been able to solve this, I've got some valuable tips from your coding. Thank you again, and have a lovely day!

POSTED BY: Jung Hwan Kim

Reply to this discussion

Reply Preview

Attachments

Remove Add a file to this post

Follow this discussion

or Discard

Group Abstract

Feedback