Group Abstract Group Abstract

Message Boards Message Boards

[WSG23] Daily Study Group: Wolfram Language Basics

Posted 2 years ago

A Wolfram U daily study group covering the implementation of Wolfram Language for tasks ranging from basic programming to video analysis begins on January 17, 2023 and runs through February 3. This study group will run on weekdays from 11:00AM–12:00PM Central US time.

This study group is an incredible way either to start learning Wolfram Language or to explore new functionality you haven't yet used. We will cover a very broad variety of topics, including but not limited to image and sound analysis, symbolics and numerics, function visualization and even cloud computation and deployment. We will even cover useful tips and tricks to help you work efficiently with notebooks!

enter image description here

No prior Wolfram Language experience is necessary. As usual, we will have questions, study materials, quizzes along the way to help you master the subject matter.

You can REGISTER HERE. I hope to see you there!

enter image description here

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi
164 Replies

I might expand on this later, but primarily I just don't think it's reasonably possible to implicitly know. You can chain and combine pure functions in any number of ways, and because the "variable(s)" for all of them are all just # (or #n), it's important to be able to explicitly delineate where one operation ends and another begins.

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi
Posted 2 years ago

Why is an "&" necessary to mark the end of a pure function definition? Can't the front end implicitly know that the definition of the pure function is complete? What's an example where the front end requires the "&" delimiter -- some delimiter -- in order to parse the pure function correctly?

The choices made by Stephen, Theo, and all the others seem rational and well-designed, but I haven't sorted this one out yet.

POSTED BY: Phil Earnhardt
Posted 2 years ago
POSTED BY: Phil Earnhardt

Hi Mitch—how frustrating! It works great for us on our end (and even returns the results a little faster than we're used to seeing, perhaps...). Have you tried another browser? If not, you might try clearing wolfram-related cookies from your browser data, annoyingly.

Specifically, try clearing the wolframcloud.com cookies. Finally, if that doesn't work, try deleting the quiz notebook that you'll find listed here.

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi
POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

I just completed Quiz 2 but when I press the "Get Results" button, nothing happens.

POSTED BY: Mitchell Sandlin

Added it to the Sample Data folder.

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi
Posted 2 years ago

Where can I get elements.xls file?

POSTED BY: Updating Name

Hi everybody—I've uploaded a filled-in Q&A transcript to the Course Materials folder (in the QnA subfolder). Here, I've gone through and added some notes/expanded upon some of the given answers—as well as filled in the very small number of questions which had not yet already been answered—for days 1-7 of this study group

This is a great way to review the material and prepare for quizzes, and also just has some generally "good to know" information, in my estimation. Please do check it out!

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

will do. thanks.

POSTED BY: Jonathan Ansell

Hi Jonathan—it is correct on my end, yes. We did have a key issue with an earlier version, but you shouldn't be experiencing that. I can't discuss quiz answers here, but please see the documentation for Apply. If that doesn't clear things up (which I expect it doesn't, or you probably wouldn't be asking), feel free to email me at my first name, last initial @wolfram.com and we can discuss specifics.

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Regarding Quiz 1, is the answer to Question 9 correct? If so, could you kindly explain why at the appropriate time? thanks.

POSTED BY: Jonathan Ansell

Hi Arben,

Thanks a lot for the explanations! Let me explain where my confusion arose, as it could be useful feedback for future courses.

First, "High-precision Numbers" is simply the wrong technical term. Numbers with a precision higher than $MachinePrecision are called "arbitrary-precision numbers" according to earlier parts of the notebook and the documentation page you've linked. This is a bit nitpicky, but it honestly confused me.

Second, I asked the wrong question. I should have asked "Why does N[Exp[100000000000000000]] yield Overflow if numbers larger than MaxMachineNumber are represented by arbitrary-precision numbers"? To which you would have answered that even for these numbers there's an upper limit, $MaxNumber.

For this reason I think it would be helpful to change the notebook slightly: just delete two zeros, and you arrive at a number that is still pretty big but can be handled by Mathematica.

In[55]:= N[Exp[1 000 000 000 000 000]]
Out[55]= 7.*10^434294481903251

Of course, there's no denying that it is impressive that Mathematica is able to do the calculations you've shown even with the larger number.

Cheers, Jörn

P.S. New question: how do I enter a dollar sign here without screwing up the output?

POSTED BY: Jörn Kersten

Here is an attempt to recursively define Depth using Level with positive second parameter. this could in turn be used for a recursive definition for negative second parameter of Level and verified by the examples loc. cit.

POSTED BY: Peter Liedermann

Yesterday's notebook claimed in the section "High-precision Numbers" that numbers outside of the range [ MinMachineNumber,MaxMachineNumber] "are automatically represented using the system that is used for high-precision numbers". What does this mean? Are "high-precision numbers" the same as numbers in "arbitrary-precision arithmetic"?

Hi Jörn—I think that this documentation page will be informative for you. In short: my understanding of what we mean by "high precision" numbers is "any number with a precision higher than $MachinePrecision. These could come from approximations of infinite precision numbers (like rationals, integers, symbolic numbers, results of special functions, and so on), or they could just be manually entered or calculated numbers with precision higher than $MachinePrecision. When we say that they're "automatically represented", we mean that if you perform some operation with the appropriate precision throughout, we won't require you to manually change anything in order for your result to maintain that precision—e.g. you won't have to "type" the variable you save these results too as a special, higher-precision type variable.

More importantly, how does this help me? N[Exp[100000000000000000]] still yields Overflow[].

It helps you because you might want to do calculations which either return an infinite precision result or use numbers beyond $MaxMachineNumber in intermediate steps. That you get an overflow when trying to get that number per se is unavoidable, but you can still have and represent the expression Exp[100000000000000000], and use it in calculations. A clear example is:

N[Exp[100000000000000000]/Exp[100000000000000000 - 10000]]

If numbers greater than $MaxMachineNumber were not representable, then this computation would not be possible. Moreover, this:

N[Exp[100000000000000000]/Exp[100000000000000000 - 10000],10000]

would not be possible either.

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Feel free to email it to me—it's first name, last initial @wolfram.com.

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi
POSTED BY: Mitchell Sandlin

Yesterday's notebook claimed in the section "High-precision Numbers" that numbers outside of the range [ $MinMachineNumber , $MaxMachineNumber] "are automatically represented using the system that is used for high-precision numbers". What does this mean? Are "high-precision numbers" the same as numbers in "arbitrary-precision arithmetic"? More importantly, how does this help me? N[Exp[100000000000000000]] still yields Overflow[].

POSTED BY: Jörn Kersten
POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Hi Mitch—please do provide the OneNote file! In your notebooks, we don't have access to your computer so we can't get the file. (Unless there's confidential information or something in there, in which case a sample file would be useful)

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Thanks phil!

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi
Posted 2 years ago

If you go into the download directory https://amoeba.wolfram.com/index.php/s/TsKDGQ6MdpNxfwc , you'll see a sub-directory "Sample Data". You'll see a data2D.dat in there. The full URL of the file is https://amoeba.wolfram.com/index.php/s/TsKDGQ6MdpNxfwc/download?path=%2FSample%20Data&files=data2D.dat

POSTED BY: Phil Earnhardt
Posted 2 years ago

where can I find data2D.dat?

POSTED BY: Updating Name

Hi Rohit;

I followed the information that you supplied the best that I could, still couldn't acquire the desired results. However, I do believe that we are closer. See Attached

Thanks,

Mitch Sandlin

Attachments:
POSTED BY: Mitchell Sandlin

Thank you, very helpful links.

POSTED BY: Richard Laugesen

Hi Richard—good question. NSolve works mostly like Solve in that it's primarily built for solving polynomial equations and will usually run into trouble for more general equations that can involve transcendental functions. FindRoot is much more general, but the tradeoff is that it needs a starting point and can only return one root at a time because it works iteratively until it finds a solution.

Reduce is (very very hand-wavily) a bit in between these two, and should stay on your radar as a potential solver (as long as you offer sufficient restrictions, e.g. reducing over the reals).

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

A few, but I wouldn't sweat it :) Those are the ones I use frequently (in addition to @@@), but I provided a few links showing ~all of the shortcuts in last week's review notebook. Those resources were:

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Great answer—thank you Rohit!

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

A cheat sheet of the sometimes mysterious-looking abbreviations would be helpful. I think so far we have seen the following:
@
/@
@@
/.
/;
//
~
Did I miss any?

POSTED BY: Richard Laugesen
Posted 2 years ago

I saw that Richard had asked in today's Q&A about units—we have full support for physical units through the Quantity function. Units will correctly interact with each other and display in a nice way.

POSTED BY: Updating Name
POSTED BY: Richard Laugesen
Posted 2 years ago

Thank you, Rohit. I'd never seen the details about serving up multiple representations of data simultaneously.

POSTED BY: Phil Earnhardt
Posted 2 years ago

Tremendous commentary Arben! I'd been wondering why we needed a PhD to be leading this course; I'm wondering no more. I'll almost certainly defer diving into this for the next two weeks, but will definitely pick it back up.

After our work with Point[] yesterday, it would certainly be educational to have an animated point moving around the path (and indicating the changes in velocity). This would be similar to graphically showing the orbits of planets in the solar system on their respective ellipses with a higher velocity as they get closer to the sun located at one foci. That would probably be a better problem to look at first. Do I just need Animate[] to be moving that point along a curve?

Two comments about the RMT Ropes "dragon roll": I'm fairly certain that our bones, muscles, and CNS never ever encountered any movement like this before. While awkward at first, our CNS does figure it out, and then it figures out how to polish the movement to be graceful and efficient. We don't have to know a peep about the physics or its computation; we just do it. When I was moving with the rope this AM, I noticed that it's certainly possible to move through the pattern without touching the ground (i.e., getting any lifting force from that bounce). However, the required forces to get the rope over your head are far smaller if you let the bounce happen. That's the general theme of impedance and gait in the human body: reactance doesn't usually make the movement possible; it makes the movement significantly more efficient. Again, it's astonishing that the CNS just notices that bounce, rolls with it, and figures out how to #!$$ use it. The CNS-controlled biomechanics of the human body are dazzling and humbling.

POSTED BY: Phil Earnhardt
Posted 2 years ago

Hi Jonathan,

A couple of ways to do this

data = {1, 4, 3, 5, 2};
plotFunctions = {PieChart, NumberLinePlot, ListPlot, BarChart};

Using Through

Through[plotFunctions[data]] // Partition[#, UpTo@2] & //
 Grid[#,
   Frame -> All,
   Spacings -> {1, 1}] &

enter image description here

Using MapThread is more flexible

options = {
  {ColorFunction -> "Pastel"}, 
  {PlotStyle -> Blue},
  {PlotTheme -> "Scientific"}, 
  {ChartLabels -> Alphabet[][[;; Length@data]], ChartStyle -> "DarkRainbow"}}

MapThread[#[data, #2, PlotLabel -> #] &, {plotFunctions, options}] // 
 Partition[#, UpTo@2] & //
 Grid[#,
   Frame -> All,
   Spacings -> {1, 1}] &

enter image description here

POSTED BY: Rohit Namjoshi

How would I don this using Map? Thank you. Visualize {1,4,3,5,2} with a piechart,numberline,lineplot and barchart.Place these in a 2×2 grid.

POSTED BY: Jonathan Ansell
  1. How can I make a simple animation that approximates the path of the centerline of the RMT rope motion? Is there an example of this helical path somewhere?

Unfortunately, I can't say I'm familiar with this type of motion and don't know how to parameterize it—if you make your own thread here on Wolfram Community, I don't doubt that somebody might be able to figure it out. It kinda looks like a lemniscate that oscillates ~sinusoidally in height? See my attached notebook for some thoughts.

  1. I'd like to compute a path based on the approximate forces on the rope, and show the resistance/reactance forces in a separate panel. I'd like to show the phase relationship between resistance/reactance, but not freak out people unfamiliar with the complex number representation of impedance. Suggestions?

Rather than using complex numbers, you could always explicitly break it down into real and imaginary components and only talk about them in real terms. In some cases there's no avoiding it, but you should be good to "brush away" most of the "complexity" here, right?

  1. Does Mathematica provide a way to visually capture the 3D path of [a marked] centerline of the rope? I may need to stitch the inputs from multiple cameras together? I was thinking of producing a 3DP of this captured path.

If the video were 3D (or a sequence of 3D images), sure—but otherwise, there's not a good way to do this from a 2D video. I suppose if you had a marking which was sufficiently large, a high enough framerate, and good camera placement, you could do it with one video. With two cameras, yes—you could measure (say) x-y motion in one video and z in the other, then put those tracked positions together. Consider a function like ImageKeypoints; you may have to do a little putzing with it but extracting this sort of data from a well-composed video (or videos) is possible, and I've done it.

Of note, you can also use Wolfram Language's Dynamic functionality to read in instrument outputs in real-time, so if you had some other way to measure, that could also work.

One unrelated request: can you capture an audio sample from your cat and show us a Fourier transform of it for the study group? Do we look at Fourier transforms? Maybe your cat just wants to contribute to the presentation. Meeeeeow.

We may briefly discuss them later in the sessions, as I do have an Images, Audio, and Video notebook that I wrote—I'll add an official Meechy Meow.

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Hi Mitch—I think I'd need the actual OneNote file to try anything here, as I don't use many Office products and don't have any experience with this.

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Thanks, nice to see how Set works in this context to create an assignment.

POSTED BY: Richard Laugesen
Posted 2 years ago

You could try this.

POSTED BY: Rohit Namjoshi

Hi; Below please find a notebook outlining a problem that I have been working on for some time. It involves importing data from a Microsoft OneNote file into a Wolfram notebook. Basically, I can figure out how to open the OneNote file but cannot figure out how to select the exact document from the OneNote file. Please review my attachments.

Thanks,

Mitch Sandlin

Attachment

POSTED BY: Mitchell Sandlin
Posted 2 years ago

Please see the background information in the attached "Impedance Background" Notebook (including a link to the RMT Ropes "dragon roll" video). Questions: 1. How can I make a simple animation that approximates the path of the centerline of the RMT rope motion? Is there an example of this helical path somewhere? 2. I'd like to compute a path based on the approximate forces on the rope, and show the resistance/reactance forces in a separate panel. I'd like to show the phase relationship between resistance/reactance, but not freak out people unfamiliar with the complex number representation of impedance. Suggestions? 3. Does Mathematica provide a way to visually capture the 3D path of [a marked] centerline of the rope? I may need to stitch the inputs from multiple cameras together? I was thinking of producing a 3DP of this captured path.

One unrelated request: can you capture an audio sample from your cat and show us a Fourier transform of it for the study group? Do we look at Fourier transforms? Maybe your cat just wants to contribute to the presentation. Meeeeeow.

POSTED BY: Phil Earnhardt
POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Glad it's useful! For completeness, you could cleverly turn a rule into a definition, in any case, with: Set@@(x->a) which is equivalent to: Apply[Set,x->a]

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Thanks, now you've taught us SolveValues, which makes it easy to extract the desired solutions.

POSTED BY: Richard Laugesen

Could you remind us how to let x equal (say) the first solution of Solve[x^2 + a x + b == 0, x] ? The Solve command outputs replacement rules, and my question is about how to turn that rule into an assignment to the variable x.

POSTED BY: Richard Laugesen

Got it, thanks! Jörn

POSTED BY: Jörn Kersten

Ah, of course—the list itself is not a number... in that case, we should explicitly specify a level rather than replacing all of the expressions which match: Replace[col,s_/;!NumericQ@s->42,1]

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Hi Arben!

Afraid not, this replaces the whole list by 42:

Cheers, Jörn

POSTED BY: Jörn Kersten

Hi Jörn, yes—try Conditional aka /;.

col/.s_/;!NumericQ[s]->42

should do it.

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Hi again!

Looking at the "Cleaning Up Data" example of day 2, I wanted to generalize the replacement to work on anything that is not a number, not just the specified strings "N/A" etc. So I'd have to replace the parts of a list that yield False when the test function NumberQ is applied. However, something like col /. _?Not[NumberQ] -> 42 doesn't do the trick (where col is a list of numbers and other objects like in the example).

Defining a new test function notNumberQ[x_] := Not[NumberQ[x]] and then using this function in the replacement does work but seems a bit clunky.

Is there a more elegant way to realize replacements with combined test functions?

Ciao, Jörn

POSTED BY: Jörn Kersten

Hi!

Hoping this hasn't been asked already: we've seen on day 2 that Map[f, g[a,b,c]] yields g[f[a],f[b],f[c]]. This no longer works if g is a function:

I get the logic: g[x,y] is replaced by Plus[1, Times[x,y]], and only then the mapping happens. But what would I have to do to get the expected result, g[f[x],f[y]] = f[x] f[y] + 1?

Cheers, Jörn

POSTED BY: Jörn Kersten

Perfect, thanks so much.

Mitch Sandlin

POSTED BY: Mitchell Sandlin

Hi Mitch—yes, I remember this. Attached is my best shot, if I've read what you've said here correctly.

  1. For the last plot, I've changed from the default (axis) display to a frame display, choosing to only display the frame on the bottom and left edges (the left frame edge replaces the y axis). I've used this to place not Ticks, but FrameTicks at the very bottom. I set the frame opacity to 0, and then set the frame ticks opacity to 1. This is necessary because without manual specification of the frame ticks style, they inherit the style of their associated frame. I updated the previous two plots to only have left frames; they keep their axes, removed the gridline at x=0, and slightly modified their plot range paddings so that the frames appear more like axes.

  2. To put it technically, this can often be a bit of a PITA. In this case, however, because of the way that Epilog works, you can just outright write the color inside the list of graphics options which specifies epilog. I've done that and changed the point sizes to all be equivalent, assuming that you want only the color to be the distinguishing factor. (Easy enough to change back if not, of course.)

Here's what I get for a final result:

enter image description here

I don't love that the points on the edges are cut off... it's due to the PlotRangePadding option. You can change that from {0,.1} to just .1 and it'll fix it, but it adds a liiiiittle space between the plot itself and the frame-edge that's serving as our y axis. If you do that, you probably want to modify the ticks such that the 0 is not included, because it looks cluttered... not sure how to avoid this presently, so pick your poison!

Attachments:
POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

In a rather rare occurrence, I believe that this functionality has been subsumed into the new "canvas" functionality, accessible through Graphics -> New Canvas. If this is missing some functionality that you need, please let me know and I'll inquire with our team about it, as I've never used this functionality myself.

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi
POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

You're very welcome!

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Hi Arben;

Many, many moons ago, you helped me with a column plot, which I have been refining ever since. There are two final refinements than I have been working on but have not been able to figure out as of yet and was wondering if you could help me - see attached.

  1. Move the Ticks of the 3rd plot all the way to the bottom. Currently, they seem congested at the origin position. I have not found anything in the documentation that allows me to move the Ticks.

  2. I would like to implement your earlier suggestion and key the colors of the Ticks to the legend (say red, Blue and black). Changing the legend is not a problem, but changing the Ticks are. I have unsuccessfully tried several things which did not work and thought I would ask.

Thanks,

Mitch Sandlin

POSTED BY: Mitchell Sandlin

I am writing custom Packages. I have two questions:

(1) What is the required or preferred filetype for a user-defined package: ".m", ".wl", ".nb", or ".wls"? (2) How do I specify the directory that the package resides in?

Attached, I've provided an example of my first attempt at Package Development. It appears to perform as expected.

I'm needing help on file administrative details.

Regards, Edward

Attachments:
POSTED BY: Edward Newsome
Posted 2 years ago

How to find the longest word in WordList[]

WordList[] // MaximalBy[StringLength]
(* {"electroencephalography"} *)
POSTED BY: Rohit Namjoshi
Posted 2 years ago

Use RuleDelayed

gr /. {p_Real, q_Real} :> {q, p}
POSTED BY: Rohit Namjoshi

It’s the same situation in the iPad/iOS flavor of the app.enter image description here

I think I had to upload notebooks from the desktop version during my previous testing. :-(

The web interface has a button which will allow you to upload notebooks… enter image description here

POSTED BY: J. Leko

Hi Peter, please see the documentation for Depth, noting specifically that Depth takes one argument—expression depth in this sense is not context-dependent.

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Drawing Tools palette: where can I find it in Mathematica 13.2 on a Mac? I do not see it in the Graphics menu or the Palettes menu.

POSTED BY: Richard Laugesen
Posted 2 years ago

That's a wonderful initiative to spread Wolfram to new learners. Thanks @Arben.

POSTED BY: Farial Mahmod

A few questions from a beginner:

  1. All Functions: the basic syntax of functions, how to interpret and resolve error messages, how to use help pages, how to find the best function(s) to use in a given situation
  2. Shortcuts/Cheatsheets: Keyboard, shortcut keys, and other cheatsheets pages to help navigate the syntax, system, etc.
  3. Best practices/tips and tricks: writing code, debugging, making it intelligible to others, most useful general functions, etc.
  4. Entities/Datasets: list of available items, how to best pull data, identify data elements available within in, the best way to utilize, etc.
  5. Specific functions: MAP and related functions - step x step and primary ways it's used. How to find the longest word in WordList[] Thanks.
POSTED BY: Jonathan Ansell
POSTED BY: Peter Liedermann
Posted 2 years ago
POSTED BY: Phil Earnhardt
POSTED BY: Peter Liedermann
Posted 2 years ago

Hello all, please see notebook.

enter image description here

Attachments:
POSTED BY: Paulo Moura

Hi Alex—frustratingly, as far as I can tell, the application doesn't have the option to import a notebook. However, if you go to https://wolframcloud.com in your web browser, you should be able to upload the notebook from there and then interact with it through the app.

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi
Posted 2 years ago

I am having troubles importing the exercises into Wolfram Cloud application. I am working on android tablet and I extracted the exercises into Download folder. There is no import option. Please help.

Attachment

Attachments:
POSTED BY: Alex Kuznetsov
Posted 2 years ago
POSTED BY: Updating Name
POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi
POSTED BY: J. Leko
POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Hi Mitch—you could calculate their ratio, or perhaps use the QuantityMagnitude function?

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi
Attachments:
POSTED BY: Mitchell Sandlin

Hi Peter! It's a fair point; I was mixing up my comparisons in a way that could well be confusing. Honestly, my intent was not to make a fair comparison between a properly-specified loop construct and mapping, but to—maybe a bit too theatrically—demonstrate that the former is messy and "redundant" compared to the latter.

(And re: list[i], I think the audio should indicate that the idea was "something like" or "some function of" or "something to do with", trying to indicate that inside the loop, we'd be doing something that required us to index list with a dummy variable, whereas with Map we wouldn't need to do that.)

Still, it could lead to confusion, so my apologies for that!

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Of course! I've received confirmation that this is the right way to think of this, and suggested a way of looking at the expression that might make this clearer still: ExpressionTree[u, "Subexpressions"]

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Hello all, please see notebook.

enter image description here

Attachments:
POSTED BY: Peter Liedermann
Posted 2 years ago

Thanks for clarifying these issues, Arben!

POSTED BY: Updating Name
POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Friday is fine. Thanks!

POSTED BY: J. Leko

Hi J—if it works for you, I'm happy to discuss that in some depth at Friday's review session so everybody can see it and hear it explained. (If you need an answer sooner, I could write it up here.)

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi
POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Hey Phil—glad you found it, and hope you can make use of it for the rest of the sessions (And just to repeat: we collect all of these Q&As and upload them at the end of each week, as well as have a full session Q&A with questions submitted through the post-session survey.)

Questions and answers are, by default, not visible to other participants, but we can (and do) "publish" them so that they become visible. Not all questions will be published for everybody to see in real-time, but many will.

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi
Posted 2 years ago

Aha. I found the Q&A button in the BigMarker software while replaying today's session. I'll look for that icon tomorrow during the live session. Are the questions of other participants viewable, or can I only view my own questions and answers? TY.

POSTED BY: Phil Earnhardt
Posted 2 years ago
POSTED BY: Phil Earnhardt
Posted 2 years ago

From comments in the presentation today, I believe there is some other place that [many] questions are being asked/answered. I don't see that area or any way to get to it. What am I missing? Help!

POSTED BY: Phil Earnhardt

Can you explain the difference between Block[], and Module[] when used for local variable scoping? To me, but Block[] example isn’t clear…

POSTED BY: J. Leko
POSTED BY: J. Leko
Attachments:
POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Mitch,

Per the documentation for these functions, the arguments are assumed to be in radians. You can use the function Degree to convert between degrees and radians.

Hope this helps.

J.

POSTED BY: J. Leko
POSTED BY: Mitchell Sandlin
Posted 2 years ago

Great content thus far....

I wanted to ask about wolfram being leveraged as part of a larger code base. How would that work?

POSTED BY: Matthew Rich
POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi
Posted 2 years ago
POSTED BY: Phil Earnhardt

Hi J! We'll talk a little bit about the difference between local and cloud functionalities for sure. Of course, if you want more information or clarification or would like to get into specifics more than we do in the lessons, you can submit your question for one of our weekly review sessions and I'll go over it in more detail :).

Looking forward to seeing you there!

POSTED BY: Arben Kalziqi

Hi.

As someone with previous Mathematica experience (over 20 years ago!), I’m looking forward to this review. Since I work from an iPad, I’m interested in learning the differences between the desktop and on-line versions of the program. So far, the distinction between commands like CloudExport, and Export are lost on me. Hope we can (briefly) address these topics.

Look forward to getting started. Thanks.

J.

POSTED BY: J. Leko
Reply to this discussion
Community posts can be styled and formatted using the Markdown syntax.
Reply Preview
Attachments
Remove
or Discard