Group Abstract Group Abstract

Message Boards Message Boards

Chat Notebooks bring the power of Notebooks to LLMs

POSTED BY: Keren Garcia
6 Replies
POSTED BY: Volodymyr Babich

Yay Theo!

POSTED BY: Kathryn Cramer
Posted 2 years ago
POSTED BY: Phil Earnhardt

No. You need to connect to an LLM that runs elsewhere, and you probably need a paid account. They are too large to run on your computer.

POSTED BY: Kathryn Cramer

I have been wondering the same thing myself. As the LLMs are currently constituted, they are almost certainly well beyond the means of even a maxed out 'home' computer.

However, I can't help wondering if it would be possible to create a LLM using Wolfram language that could run on a laptop. My current MacBook Pro has 64 Gbytes RAM, and 2 TByte storage, but current iterations can have more of both, to say nothing of the Mac Studio. I first ran Mathematica (version 1.1) on an SE/30 that had 8 Mbytes RAM (the minimum was 2.5), and that extra RAM almost doubled the cost of the computer -- but it was well worth it. In my opinion, current hardware capacity is being underutilized by Mathematica.

Creating a LLM would be beyond what could be done without linked servers, but running one should be possible. (?)

A useful first step would be to make the current neural net functionality use Apple's hardware, instead of requiring a NVIDIA GPU. Next, applying some of the multi-computational ideas from Stephen's physics project might be better than the current effort, which seems to be more 'brute force' than necessary.

I would not mind if the LLM 'specialized' in Wolfram Language code. Such specialization might require fewer resources, and would avoid a lot of issues with current LLMs. (In tests I've done, the LLM seems to make stuff up at least 50% of the time, which renders it useless for many use cases.)

Reply to this discussion
Community posts can be styled and formatted using the Markdown syntax.
Reply Preview
Attachments
Remove
or Discard