Group Abstract Group Abstract

Message Boards Message Boards

How to handle big expressions in Mathematica

5 Replies

Deleted...

Thanks for writing this up, I will certainly have a look to see whether the methods/workarounds you present here could be used in my research, though of course I run most computationally expensive calculations in FORM.

I think your conclusions nicely summarize the feelings of the theoretical physics community; we spend a lot of money on Mathematica licenses, while the development efforts and direction hardly benefit us at all (here I acknowledge at least recent efforts to improve polynomial arithmetic performance through the use of FLINT). It is quite discouraging to see some of the new features introduced lately when some core functionality is so inadequate for our needs. If Mathematica 15 were simply "Mathematica 14, but much faster, and no regressions in Series" I think we would consider this to be a release actually worth paying for.

I would also be very interested to hear any opinions of the developers on this topic.

POSTED BY: Josh Davies
Posted 3 months ago

As someone who uses Mathematica every day for my own research, I can strongly relate to the ideas mentioned in this post. I prefer working with Mathematica, but it is always frustrating when I have to switch to other tools because handling symbolic expressions becomes too difficult or counterintuitive.

I would definitely support the directions for future development that were mentioned.

POSTED BY: Leonid Shumilov
Posted 3 months ago

Good read! +1

POSTED BY: Zoltán Péli

Excellent post!!! I agree with all your conclusions and recommendations!!! I am really very curious how will react community and mainly WR staff.

Reply to this discussion
Community posts can be styled and formatted using the Markdown syntax.
Reply Preview
Attachments
Remove
or Discard