Group Abstract Group Abstract

Message Boards Message Boards

0
|
8.7K Views
|
9 Replies
|
0 Total Likes
View groups...
Share
Share this post:

image registration

Posted 11 years ago
POSTED BY: Alexia werk
9 Replies
Posted 11 years ago

I have seen the attached file, my output is almost same. I am just thinking is such results can be true. Because they are looking very strange. This was one reason so I still think its not working.

Attachments:
POSTED BY: Alexia werk
Attachments:
POSTED BY: Henrik Schachner
Posted 11 years ago

Thanks all. Not working for these points

coordimg1 = {{309., 174.}, {252., 98.}, {113., 116.}, {181., 161.}}

coordimg2 = {{314., 145.}, {267., 120.}, {159., 129.}, {215., 161.}}

POSTED BY: Alexia werk
POSTED BY: Shadi Ashnai
Posted 11 years ago

see the attachment.

HighlightImage[img1, coordimg1, "HighlightColor" -> Green, Method -> {"CrossMarkers", 8}];

Attachments:
POSTED BY: Alexia werk

Method->"CrossMarkers" in HighlightImage are solid (or, at least, supposed to be). If you see this differently, please send us an example.

POSTED BY: Shadi Ashnai
Posted 11 years ago

With highlight function can we also make the crossmarker solid. The marker does not looks so solid. I tried but it seems its not avilable with this.

POSTED BY: Alexia werk
Posted 11 years ago

Thank you so much.

POSTED BY: Alexia werk

Hi Alexia,

I think your problem can nicely be solved: The function FindGeometricTransform is made for this kind of task. The crucial thing is to re-oder one of the sets of points, so that there is a correspondence between the points of both sets - see attached notebook. Hope that helps!

Regards -- Henrik

Attachments:
POSTED BY: Henrik Schachner
Reply to this discussion
Community posts can be styled and formatted using the Markdown syntax.
Reply Preview
Attachments
Remove
or Discard