I would recommend the book: Edwin R. Taylor and John Archibald Wheeler, Exploring Black Holes: Introduction to General Relativity, 2000, Addison Weslay Longman. Specifically, pages 2-28 to 2-31 discuss gravitational effects on time.

In the following dt[Infinity] is a time interval measured by a stationary clock at infinity. dt[r,M] is the corresponding time interval measured by a clock at a relative radius r to the radius of the black hole horizon. So putting r==2M would correspond to being at the black hole horizon.

dt[r_, M_] := dt[Infinity] Sqrt[1 - 2 M/r]

The following plots the time interval of a clock at radius r relative to the interval measured by a clock at infinity.

The time interval goes to zero at the black hole horizon (r = 2) so you can get values as small as you want. For example, at r = 2.0001 we obtain:

dt[2.0001, 1]
0.00707089 dt[\[Infinity]]

As the clock is moved further and further out its time intervals get closer and closer to the clock at infinity.

Yes, that's how many seconds would pass on the clock that near the event horizon compared to 1 second passing on the far clock. And even less time would pass as you got closer. At r = 2 no time would pass. But to make a good book you should get the help of an interested physicist. Maybe like Lawrence Krauss at Arizona University.

And I bought that book for $37.50 at Border's Book Store sometime after 2000.

Dear Jofre,

Thank you for your reply. I don't see your response on the website but I did get an email. Unfortunately, I must be doing something wrong. My input is this:

1. time in rest frame (what or where is the rest frame?): 90 years
2. gravitational acceleration: 1.52 x 10^12g
3. radius: 30km

My answer is -1.423 x 10^9 i seconds. I don't know what i means, and I'm not seeing where I wait 63 years to watch my friend age 90 years. It also contradicts an astronomer who only would say I'd wait "less than a blink of an eye." I apologize for the confusion. This subject is a bit thicker than I'm used to :-)

<<If you know very little about general relativity (even though you might be a great graphic artist!) how can you write a small book about black holes for middle school students? Are you partnering with a physicist who is well versed in gravitational physics? Are you an expert in that yourself? If not, how good the students get a good book?>>

First, thanks for your reply and the recommendation of Lawrence Krauss. I will see if I can get in touch with him.

You ask a very good question about how good the book will be. The book (really a reader) is twenty pages and 2000 words, plus pictures. I've been studying black holes for a year now and believe me, there's enough there for 2000 pages even for the average graphic artist. It's very hard to write about this subject without getting into the tall weeds, and some concepts are difficult to wrap the brain around. How do you explain general relativity in two sentences for a 10-year-old? That's the challenge. I'm working on the first draft of the manuscript, which will then go to my editor who's an expert in educational writing. It will then indeed be fact checked and discussed with a physics expert. And then the book will be leveled for the appropriate age, and then, most likely, be fact checked again. It's a long process.

Although I don't have a deep understanding of the physics, I have a reasonable comprehension of the facts and concepts. I do understand time dilation, the equivalence principle, and even a bit of the Lorentz transformation, but for the finer mathematical details I get lost in the equations. And yes, I did watch all two hours of Dr. Physics. Even grasped some of it :-) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foRPKAKZWx8

The purpose of the books isn't to provide a comprehensive study but an introduction. Hopefully, kids (and maybe even adults) will find black holes and relativity as fascinating as you and I do, and inspire "Hey Dad, I bet you didn't know about this . . . !!!"

Thanks again for your help and best regards,

Jack