You are quite right. I do not understand the issue. What is omega supposed to mean. There is no definition of it. Many people have named different functions omega. Also, what are the ".." supposed to mean? There is a built in meaning for that in MMA/WL, but it is most likely not what you mean. What do you want to express with the square brackets?

What do you want to calculate? What is the meaning of what you want to code?

Cheers,

Marco

That's what I was trying to explain. Square brackets are used in the Wolfram Language to indicate input to a function. Round brackets are not. The code that you submitted does not conform to the Syntax of the Wolfram Language - also you should post it in a code box in this forum.

Anyway, you are right I did not try your code, because it is obviously not Wolfram Language. Now just to make the obvious absolutely certain, I did type it in and it, of course, gives an error message that the code is not complete. Even a cursory look at the documentation confirms that.

Now, you said that you used WolframAlpha which interprets your input and also accepts syntactically incorrect input. The thing is that it sometimes misinterprets what your input. What I wanted to say is that your input will be difficult to interpret for it; and that also to me it is not quite clear what you want to achieve.

If output is misinterpreted it can take a long time to evaluate. I typed the full input into WolframAlpha and it does evaluate within fractions of a second.

I cannot imagine that this is the interpretation you mean. The shorter input also evaluates in no time at all.

Cheers, M.

That is probably because the syntax you use is meaningless for the Wolfram Language. In fact, I am not quite sure what you want to achieve based on your input. I guess that Wolfram Alpha cannot parse this and tries something that does not work.

Best wishes,

M.