User Portlet
Discussions |
---|
Francois: your comments contain several misstatements that indicate a lack of understanding of the way science works. (1) " Strictly speaking, the Wolfram Physics project isn’t science." This is wrong. The project does employ a different (but by no... |
i am now ready for Phase 2 of this work. i have 5 very brief research articles (totalling |
terrific video. i well remember the 'old days' when Mathematiica was being created at stephen's Center for Complex Systems Research (CCSR) on the U of I campus. i would stop by there almost daily at around 3am (my own working hours are a bit strange)... |
" I am not aware that Wolfram Research has a mission statement, as such, but if it did it might be something like: To provide a comprehensive framework for computational thinking and, as a rider, to establish the Wolfram Language as the Lingua... |
check it out: https://www.amazon.com/Idea-Makers-Personal-Perspectives-Notable/dp/1579550037/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1467129316&sr=8-1&keywords=stephen+wolfram |
I just came across a video of Stephen Wolfram on CNBC: [**Stephen Wolfram: Why this brilliant physicist ditched his job**][1] [![enter image description here][2]][1] [1]:... |
i just had to google those two guys to find out that they created Python and Ruby, respectively (i'm a theoretical physicist and those are the nerds i know). you can't compare the two s'es (steve jobs and stephen wolfram) - btw, i assume you know... |
for those interested in the Einstein's view on discrete or discontinuum (as opposed to field-based) physics, which is in line with Stephen's model of the universe, i am attaching a possibly hard-to-find article as well as Stephen's blog. |
there's a new book due out soon on CA art "Designing Beauty: The Art of Cellular Automata (Emergence, Complexity and Computation) " ... |
i know about Feynman's statement. of course. as for LQL theory, i think its a dead end because it makes no testable predictions. - see (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEr038WOKFI) . i like Sorkin's causal set approach much better (i have no idea... |