User Portlet
Featured Contributor
| Discussions |
|---|
| [![enter image description here][1]][2] [Here is a ResourceFunction][3]. I will never be able to polish it in time for the real Wolfram Function Repository and, if I did, it would need to be far more general. But here is a resource function... |
| I don't know whether this information is useful to anyone but me, but on the off chance that it is -- and also to memorialize it -- I have grouped the properties of a ClassifierMeasurementsObject into those that are invariant to the value of the... |
| Thanks for the idea. Unfortunately, I can not get that to work. For some reason Cases is not penetrating the TagBoxes and the like that occur when you use ToBoxes. The code below, for example, returns an empty list even though if you actually look... |
| Yes. But t->0 is somewhat misleading, or at least incomplete. I wonder if a more sophisticated answer might be returned such as t->Interval[{-inf,inf}] or some sort of warning message were printed. |
| If one runs NetMeasurements[net,data,"ROCCurve"] one often gets a 2 x 140 matrix as the output. The first part represents false positive rate values and the second part represents true positive rate values. Each part appears to have 140 values... |
| I came up with an idea that is more general and permits some fairly natural representations of the conditions. I plan on making this into a ResourceFunction. Comments welcome. Here's a notebook containing the idea. &[Wolfram Notebook][1] ... |
| Here's a notebook that explains the problem: &[Wolfram Notebook][1] [1]: https://www.wolframcloud.com/obj/b67715d5-8616-436a-b5b3-24fc79846cd2 |
| Here is a notebook with further information on the peculiar behavior (as well as what may be a simple workaround). &[Wolfram Notebook][1] [1]: https://www.wolframcloud.com/obj/3f13942c-d61a-4b65-a9df-f989b1a39db9 |
| Dataset can wrap up a lot of things, but if you have a simple List of Lists inside, you can just do the following and get a Latex array. Query[TeXForm][Dataset[RandomInteger[{1, 10}, {20, 2}]]] You can also write out a full TeX document... |
| I am not a physicist and have been trying to work my way through the ideas of Wolfram Physics. So, what I am about to write could be drivel or based on a complete misunderstanding. But I wonder if one could generalize the idea of causal invariance... |